Is Isosource (complete nutrition supplement) 1.5 calorie equivalent to Jevity (complete nutrition supplement) 1.5?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: August 26, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Isosource 1.5 vs Jevity 1.5: Nutritional Equivalence Comparison

Isosource 1.5 calorie is nutritionally equivalent to Jevity 1.5 in terms of caloric density, but they differ in their FODMAP content and fiber composition, which may impact gastrointestinal tolerance.

Nutritional Comparison

Both Isosource 1.5 and Jevity 1.5 are classified as nutritionally complete enteral formulas with similar core characteristics:

  • Caloric density: Both provide 1.5 calories per mL
  • Macronutrient composition: Both contain whole proteins, long-chain triglycerides, and carbohydrates predominantly as polysaccharides 1
  • Completeness: Both are nutritionally complete formulas that can serve as sole sources of nutrition
  • Basic features: Both are typically lactose and gluten-free 2

Key Differences

Despite their similar caloric profiles, these formulas have important differences:

FODMAP Content

  • Isosource 1.5: Contains 47-71% lower FODMAP (fermentable oligosaccharides, disaccharides, monosaccharides, and polyols) content compared to other formulas including Jevity 3, 4
  • Clinical impact: Lower FODMAP content in Isosource 1.5 has been associated with a five-fold reduction in diarrhea risk in enteral nutrition patients 3

Fiber Composition

  • Isosource: Contains a proprietary fiber blend (IS50®) that may improve bowel function 5
  • Jevity: Contains fiber but with a different composition

Clinical Considerations for Formula Selection

Gastrointestinal Tolerance

  • For patients at high risk of diarrhea, Isosource 1.5 may be preferable due to its lower FODMAP content 3, 4
  • High-risk patients include those with:
    • Anticipated longer duration of enteral nutrition
    • Expected longer hospital stay
    • Concurrent antibiotic use

Flow Rate Considerations

  • Flow rates between the formulas may differ slightly depending on the feeding tube size used 6
  • This may be relevant for patients receiving gravity feedings

Protein Content

  • While both formulas provide complete protein, specific variants like Isosource Protein Fiber have been shown to have good gastrointestinal tolerance and may help regulate intestinal transit 5

Monitoring Recommendations

Regardless of formula choice:

  • Monitor for gastrointestinal symptoms, particularly diarrhea
  • Assess tolerance during the first few days of administration
  • Consider switching formulas if intolerance develops

Conclusion

While Isosource 1.5 and Jevity 1.5 are calorically equivalent and both nutritionally complete, Isosource 1.5 may offer advantages for patients at risk of diarrhea due to its lower FODMAP content. For standard nutritional support in low-risk patients, either formula can provide adequate nutritional support.

References

Guideline

Enteral Nutrition Formulas

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Role of FODMAP content in enteral nutrition-associated diarrhea.

Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology, 2013

Research

Comparison of Gravity Flow Rates Between ENFit and Legacy Feeding Tubes.

JPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition, 2018

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.