What is the evidence for methylene blue in treating septic shock or cardiogenic shock?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: March 11, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

From the Guidelines

Methylene blue should only be considered for use in septic shock and cardiogenic shock as a rescue therapy when standard treatments, including conventional vasopressors like norepinephrine, vasopressin, and epinephrine, have failed. The evidence for methylene blue in treating septic shock and cardiogenic shock is limited, with most guidelines focusing on the use of conventional vasopressors as first-line therapy 1. In septic shock, the primary approach involves fluid resuscitation and the use of vasopressors like norepinephrine to maintain a mean arterial pressure of 65 mmHg 1. For cardiogenic shock, the management strategy includes the use of inotropic agents and vasopressors, with norepinephrine being considered in specific scenarios where there is inadequate organ perfusion despite fluid challenge and inotropic support 1. Given the potential side effects of methylene blue, such as serotonin syndrome, hemolytic anemia, and interference with pulse oximetry, its use should be carefully considered and ideally undertaken in consultation with critical care specialists. Key points to consider include:

  • The dosing of methylene blue, typically 1-2 mg/kg IV over 10-20 minutes, sometimes followed by a continuous infusion of 0.25-0.5 mg/kg/hr.
  • The potential for methylene blue to cause blue discoloration of skin, urine, and bodily fluids.
  • The need for caution when combining methylene blue with serotonergic drugs due to the risk of serotonin syndrome.
  • The importance of monitoring for signs of hemolytic anemia, particularly in G6PD-deficient patients.
  • The potential for methylene blue to interfere with pulse oximetry readings, which could impact patient monitoring and management. Overall, while methylene blue may have a role in the management of refractory septic or cardiogenic shock, its use should be approached with caution and as part of a comprehensive treatment strategy that prioritizes established therapies.

From the Research

Methylene Blue in Treating Septic Shock

  • Methylene blue has been used to increase blood pressure in patients with septic shock by acting on guanylate cyclase and nitric oxide synthase 2.
  • A pilot randomized controlled trial found that early administration of methylene blue in combination with standard treatment for septic shock might reduce vasopressor dose 2.
  • Another study aimed to investigate the clinical effect of methylene blue in septic shock and explore whether it can increase arterial pressure and reduce the usage of vasopressors 3.
  • The use of methylene blue in septic patients with an early diagnosis can contribute to an earlier resolution of shock compared to standard treatment 4.

Efficacy and Safety of Methylene Blue

  • Methylene blue administration is associated with increases in mean arterial pressure while reducing catecholamine requirements in patients experiencing septic shock 5.
  • However, its effects on morbidity and mortality remain unknown, and well-designed, prospective evaluations are needed to define the role of methylene blue as treatment of septic shock 5.
  • An observational study found that the use of intravenous methylene blue in refractory shock as an adjuvant therapy significantly improved the mean arterial blood pressure and decreased the requirement of vasopressor therapy 6.

Hemodynamic and Metabolic Response

  • Methylene blue has been shown to improve hemodynamic parameters and oxygen delivery in patients with septic shock 5.
  • However, its use may be limited by adverse pulmonary effects, and further studies are needed to evaluate its safety and efficacy 5.
  • A study found that methylene blue therapy was started together with the indication of vasopressin as a second vasopressor, and the methylene blue group showed an immediate reduction in norepinephrine dosage and an earlier reduction in vasopressin dosage compared to the control group 2.

Cardiogenic Shock

  • There is no direct evidence in the provided studies to support the use of methylene blue in treating cardiogenic shock.
  • The studies primarily focus on the use of methylene blue in septic shock, and its efficacy and safety in cardiogenic shock are not addressed 2, 3, 4, 5, 6.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.