Treatment Options for Uterine Prolapse
Hysterectomy is the most definitive treatment for uterine prolapse in women who do not desire future fertility, providing complete resolution of prolapse-related symptoms, though less invasive options should be considered first due to potential long-term complications. 1
Evaluation and Classification
Before selecting treatment, proper evaluation is essential:
- Assess symptoms: pelvic heaviness/fullness, low back pain, protruding vaginal mass, bleeding from mucosal ulcerations, voiding difficulties, recurrent urinary infections
- Evaluate prolapse by compartment (anterior, apical, posterior)
- Document severity using POP-Q classification (stages 1-4)
- Rule out other pelvic pathologies that may mimic symptoms
Treatment Algorithm
First-Line Conservative Options
Pelvic Floor Muscle Training (PFMT)
Pessary Devices
- Recommended as first-line therapy alongside PFMT 2
- Mechanical support for prolapsed organs
- Various types available (ring, Gellhorn, cube, donut)
- Requires periodic removal and cleaning
- Regular follow-up needed to prevent complications like vaginal erosion
Lifestyle Modifications
- Weight loss if overweight/obese
- Avoidance of heavy lifting
- Treatment of chronic constipation
- Smoking cessation
Surgical Options (for failed conservative management or severe prolapse)
Vaginal Approach
Vaginal hysterectomy with vault suspension
- Preferred for small uterus and when patient has no desire for future fertility 1
- Careful ligation of uterosacral and cardinal ligaments required
- Cul-de-sac obliteration necessary to reduce enterocele risk
- Shorter recovery time compared to abdominal approach
- Lower complication rates than abdominal hysterectomy
Vaginal repair with autologous tissue
- Recommended particularly for elderly or frail patients 2
- Addresses associated cystocele/rectocele
- Colpocleisis (vaginal closure) is an option for those who will not be sexually active
Abdominal Approach
Abdominal hysterectomy
- Consider when uterus is large or patient has extensive pelvic adhesions 1
- Higher complication rates than vaginal approach
- Longer recovery time
Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy
- Recommended for apical and anterior prolapse 2
- Uses mesh to suspend the vaginal apex to the sacrum
- Lower recurrence rates than vaginal repairs
- Mesh placement requires multidisciplinary team consultation
Important Considerations
Surgical Risks: Hysterectomy, even with ovarian conservation, is associated with increased risk of cardiovascular disease, mood disorders, osteoporosis, and potentially dementia 1
Mesh Complications: Decision to use mesh should be made by a multidisciplinary team due to potential complications 2
Post-Treatment Follow-up: All patients should be reassessed by the surgeon after surgery, even in absence of symptoms 2
Fertility Preservation: For women desiring future fertility, pessary and PFMT are the primary options
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
Inadequate assessment: Failing to evaluate all compartments of prolapse can lead to incomplete treatment
Overlooking associated conditions: Prolapse often coexists with urinary incontinence, which may worsen after prolapse correction
Choosing inappropriate surgical approach: Selection should consider patient age, comorbidities, sexual activity status, and severity of prolapse
Ignoring patient preferences: Treatment should align with patient goals regarding fertility, sexual function, and invasiveness of intervention
Insufficient follow-up: Regular monitoring is essential, especially with pessary use, to prevent complications
The evidence strongly suggests that conservative approaches should be tried before proceeding to surgery, but when surgery is indicated, the least invasive approach that adequately addresses the prolapse should be selected.