Management of Uterine Prolapse in Older Postmenopausal Women with Comorbidities Who Wish to Avoid Surgery
For older postmenopausal women with symptomatic uterine prolapse who wish to avoid surgery, pessary use is the recommended initial management, as it provides effective nonsurgical treatment without the risks of operative intervention in this high-risk population. 1
Initial Assessment and Risk Stratification
- Confirm the diagnosis through pelvic examination to identify which compartments are involved (anterior vaginal wall, vaginal apex/uterus, or posterior vaginal wall), as prolapse often represents a combination of these 1
- Document the severity of prolapse using standardized staging systems during examination 1
- Assess for specific symptoms including pelvic pressure, vaginal bulge sensation, urinary dysfunction, bowel dysfunction, or sexual dysfunction, noting that vaginal bulging is the only symptom specific to prolapse 2, 1
- Evaluate medical comorbidities that increase surgical risk, as these patients are often not medically fit for surgery 1
First-Line Conservative Management: Pessary Use
Pessaries are an effective nonsurgical option and should be offered as first-line treatment for older postmenopausal women with comorbidities who wish to avoid surgery. 1
- Pessaries provide mechanical support for prolapsed organs without requiring anesthesia or operative intervention 2, 1
- This approach is particularly appropriate for patients not desiring surgery or those who are medically unfit for operative management 1
- Pessaries can effectively manage symptoms in women with symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse across all stages of severity 1
Observation as an Alternative
- For women with asymptomatic pelvic organ prolapse, observation is typically the appropriate management strategy 1
- Many women with pelvic organ prolapse are asymptomatic and do not require active treatment 2
- Regular monitoring without intervention is reasonable when prolapse is not causing bothersome symptoms 2
Pelvic Floor Physical Therapy Considerations
- Pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) may provide benefit for prolapse symptoms and anatomical improvement, though evidence is limited in the postmenopausal population 3
- Six months of supervised PFMT has shown benefits in terms of anatomical and symptom improvement in women with symptomatic prolapse 3
- PFMT increases the chance of improvement in prolapse stage by 17% compared to no intervention 3
- Women receiving PFMT report greater improvement in prolapse symptoms compared to control groups 3
- PFMT improves pelvic floor muscle function and may reduce urinary and bowel symptom frequency and bother 3
Lifestyle Modifications
- Consider weight loss in overweight or obese patients, as increasing body-mass index is a consistent risk factor for prolapse development 2
- Advise reduction of heavy lifting to minimize intra-abdominal pressure 2
- Treat constipation to reduce chronic straining, which contributes to prolapse progression 2
- These lifestyle interventions may help prevent worsening of existing prolapse 2
When Conservative Management Fails
- If pessary use fails or is not tolerated, and symptoms remain bothersome despite conservative measures, surgical options may need reconsideration despite initial preference to avoid surgery 1
- Surgical strategies include reconstructive procedures (via abdominal or vaginal approach) or obliterative techniques 2
- The decision to proceed with surgery should involve shared decision-making, weighing the extent of prolapse, medical comorbidities, differences in durability and risk between operations, and patient preferences 1
Critical Pitfalls to Avoid
- Do not assume all pelvic symptoms are due to prolapse—bladder, bowel, and pelvic symptoms are not specific to prolapse except for vaginal bulging 2
- Do not routinely order radiographic assessment, as it is usually unnecessary for prolapse diagnosis and management 2
- Do not overlook the option of observation in asymptomatic women, as treatment is not mandatory for all cases of prolapse 2, 1
- Do not force surgical intervention on patients who are poor surgical candidates or who strongly prefer conservative management, as effective nonsurgical options exist 1