Non-Surgical Treatment Options for Pelvic Organ Prolapse
For postmenopausal women with mild to moderate pelvic organ prolapse, pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) is the first-line treatment, with pessaries as an effective alternative for those who cannot or do not wish to perform exercises. 1
Treatment Algorithm
First-Line: Pelvic Floor Muscle Training (PFMT)
- PFMT involves instruction on voluntary contraction of pelvic floor muscles (Kegel exercises) and should be supervised by a trained physical therapist rather than self-taught. 1, 2
- Evidence shows PFMT increases the chance of improvement in prolapse stage by 17% compared to no treatment after six months of supervised training. 1
- PFMT improves prolapse symptoms, reduces severity on examination, and enhances pelvic floor muscle function. 1
- The benefit extends beyond anatomical improvement: women report better urinary symptoms (reduced frequency and bother) and improved bowel function (less frequency and bother with symptoms). 1
Important caveat: PFMT may not be effective for high-stage or apical prolapse, where mechanical support is more compromised. 2
Second-Line: Pessary Management
- Pessaries are mechanical devices that provide structural support and represent the most commonly used conservative management option for women who prefer non-surgical treatment or are medically unfit for surgery. 3, 2
- Pessaries require regular follow-up care to minimize complications such as vaginal erosion, discharge, or ulceration. 2
- This option is particularly appropriate for postmenopausal women with comorbidities that increase surgical risk. 3
Adjunctive Lifestyle Modifications
- Weight loss and exercise are recommended for obese women with pelvic organ prolapse, as obesity increases chronic intra-abdominal pressure on pelvic structures. 4, 5
- Treatment of chronic constipation and reduction of straining is essential, as chronic straining from activities that repeatedly increase intra-abdominal pressure contributes to prolapse progression. 5, 6
- Avoiding heavy lifting and modifying occupational factors (jobs involving heavy lifting or prolonged standing) can prevent worsening. 5, 6
When Conservative Management is Appropriate
- Observation alone is appropriate for asymptomatic prolapse, as many women with pelvic organ prolapse do not require treatment. 3
- Conservative management is typically used for mild to moderate prolapse cases. 7, 1
- Treatment decisions should prioritize symptom burden rather than anatomical severity alone, as prolapse primarily causes morbidity affecting quality of life rather than mortality. 5
Evidence Quality and Limitations
The evidence base has evolved significantly. While a 2004 Cochrane review found no eligible randomized controlled trials for conservative management 7, the updated 2011 review included six trials demonstrating PFMT effectiveness. 1 However, most trials remain small (less than 25 women per arm) with moderate to high risk of bias in some studies. 1 The largest rigorous trial to date supports six months of supervised PFMT for both anatomical and symptom improvement. 1
Common pitfall: Self-taught Kegel exercises are less effective than supervised PFMT with a trained physical therapist, yet many women attempt exercises without proper instruction. 2