Is Keflex (Cephalexin) appropriate for a 65-year-old male with diabetes presenting with a week-old foot wound showing signs of erythema around the edges?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: September 1, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Management of Diabetic Foot Infection in a 65-Year-Old Male

Cephalexin (Keflex) is an appropriate first-line antibiotic choice for this patient with a diabetic foot wound showing erythema without fluctuance or drainage, as it provides good coverage against the most common pathogens in mild diabetic foot infections. 1

Assessment of Infection Severity

This patient presents with:

  • 65-year-old male with diabetes
  • Week-old foot wound
  • Erythema around the edges (sign of infection)
  • No fluctuance or drainage
  • No mention of systemic symptoms

Based on the IDSA guidelines, this appears to be a mild diabetic foot infection (DFI), defined by:

  • Presence of ≥2 classic signs of inflammation (erythema present)
  • Limited to skin and superficial subcutaneous tissue
  • No systemic signs of infection 1

Antibiotic Selection

Rationale for Cephalexin (Keflex):

  1. For mild DFIs, empiric therapy should target gram-positive cocci, especially staphylococci and streptococci, which are the most common pathogens 1
  2. Oral therapy is appropriate for mild infections in patients who can tolerate oral medications 2
  3. Cephalexin, a first-generation cephalosporin, provides excellent coverage against the most common causative organisms 1, 2
  4. Treatment duration for mild infections is typically 7-10 days 2

Alternative Options:

  • Amoxicillin-clavulanate if broader coverage is desired
  • Clindamycin if penicillin allergy is present
  • Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole if MRSA is suspected 1, 2

Important Considerations

When to Broaden Coverage:

  • Consider broader coverage if:
    • Patient has had previous antibiotic treatment
    • Chronic wound
    • History of MRSA
    • Immunocompromised state
    • Poor response to initial therapy within 48-72 hours 1, 2

When to Add Pseudomonas Coverage:

  • Not indicated in this case unless:
    • Foot frequently exposed to water
    • Previous antibiotic failure
    • Chronic wound 2

When to Add Anaerobic Coverage:

  • Not indicated in this case unless:
    • Necrotic tissue present
    • Gangrenous changes
    • Ischemic limb 2

Additional Management

Wound Care:

  • Debridement of any necrotic tissue or surrounding callus is essential 1
  • Appropriate dressing based on wound characteristics
  • Offloading pressure from the wound 1

Monitoring:

  • Re-evaluate within 48-72 hours to assess response to therapy 2
  • If no improvement after 48-72 hours, consider:
    • Changing antibiotics
    • Obtaining cultures
    • Reassessing for deeper infection or osteomyelitis 1, 2

Red Flags Requiring Escalation:

  • Development of systemic symptoms
  • Worsening local signs (increasing erythema, warmth, pain)
  • Development of fluctuance or drainage
  • Spreading infection beyond initial margins 1

Conclusion

For this 65-year-old diabetic male with a foot wound showing erythema without fluctuance or drainage, Keflex (cephalexin) is an appropriate first-line antibiotic choice. The infection appears mild based on the limited information provided, and cephalexin provides good coverage against the most common pathogens in this setting. Close follow-up within 48-72 hours is essential to ensure appropriate response to therapy.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Diabetic Foot Infections

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.