Diagnosis of Aortic Dissection
The most effective diagnostic approach for aortic dissection is to use CT scan with IV contrast as the first-line imaging modality for hemodynamically stable patients, and transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) for unstable patients who cannot be transported safely for CT imaging. 1
Clinical Presentation and Initial Assessment
- Pain characteristics: Typically severe, sudden-onset "tearing" or "ripping" pain, often in the chest but may radiate to the back or abdomen
- Vital signs: Check for hypertension (common) or hypotension (ominous sign suggesting rupture, tamponade)
- Physical exam findings:
- Pulse deficits or blood pressure differentials between limbs (>20 mmHg)
- New diastolic murmur suggesting aortic regurgitation
- Signs of cardiac tamponade (muffled heart sounds, jugular venous distention)
- Neurological deficits suggesting malperfusion
Diagnostic Algorithm
Step 1: Risk Stratification
Assess for high-risk features:
- Sudden, severe chest/back/abdominal pain
- Known aortic aneurysm
- Marfan syndrome or other connective tissue disorders
- Family history of aortic disease
- Recent aortic manipulation (catheterization, surgery)
- Known bicuspid aortic valve
Step 2: Initial Testing
- ECG: To rule out acute coronary syndrome (though normal ECG does not exclude dissection)
- Chest X-ray: Look for widened mediastinum, abnormal aortic contour, pleural effusion
- Caution: Normal in 10-20% of aortic dissection cases 2
- Laboratory tests: Cardiac biomarkers, D-dimer (high sensitivity but low specificity)
Step 3: Definitive Imaging
Based on patient stability:
For hemodynamically stable patients:
CT angiography (first choice): Sensitivity 98.3%, specificity 87.1% 3
- Advantages: Widely available, rapid acquisition, can visualize entire aorta
- Disadvantages: Radiation exposure, contrast nephrotoxicity
MRI (if available and no contraindications): Sensitivity 98.3%, specificity 97.8% 3
- Advantages: No radiation, highest specificity, excellent for chronic dissection
- Disadvantages: Limited availability, longer acquisition time, contraindicated with certain implants
For hemodynamically unstable patients:
Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE): Sensitivity 97.7%, specificity 76.9% 3
- Advantages: Can be performed at bedside, rapid, no contrast needed
- Disadvantages: Operator-dependent, limited visualization of distal aorta
Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE): Limited sensitivity (59.3%) 3
- Use primarily to identify complications (pericardial effusion, aortic regurgitation)
- Not sufficient to rule out dissection
Classification and Management Implications
- Stanford Type A (involves ascending aorta): Surgical emergency
- Stanford Type B (limited to descending aorta): Often managed medically unless complications
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
- Diagnostic delay: Aortic dissection is often misdiagnosed as acute coronary syndrome, leading to inappropriate anticoagulation
- Overreliance on TTE: Cannot be used to exclude aortic dissection due to low sensitivity
- Missing subtle presentations: Not all patients present with classic tearing pain
- Failure to recognize malperfusion syndromes: Stroke, limb ischemia, mesenteric ischemia
- Inadequate blood pressure control: Uncontrolled hypertension can worsen dissection
Special Considerations
- Pregnant patients: MRI preferred to avoid radiation exposure
- Renal insufficiency: Consider MRI or TEE to avoid contrast nephrotoxicity
- Inherited disorders: Lower threshold for imaging in Marfan syndrome, Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, and other connective tissue disorders 1
The European Society of Cardiology Task Force on aortic dissection emphasizes rapid diagnosis and decision-making using appropriate imaging techniques to establish a correct diagnosis while avoiding diagnostic overkill 1. While MRI offers the highest specificity, CT angiography remains the most practical first-line test in most emergency settings due to its widespread availability and speed.