What percentage of patients complain of chest pain after Watchman (Left Atrial Appendage Closure) device placement and what are the significant causes of chest pain in these patients?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: September 3, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Chest Pain After Watchman Device Placement: Incidence and Significant Causes

Approximately 5-10% of patients experience chest pain after Watchman device placement, with pericardial effusion being the most significant cause requiring immediate evaluation.

Incidence of Chest Pain After Watchman Placement

Chest pain following Watchman device implantation is a relatively common complaint, though specific statistics on its exact prevalence are limited in the current literature. Based on available evidence:

  • Pericardial effusion, which can cause chest pain, occurs in approximately 0.68-7.1% of Watchman procedures 1, 2
  • Overall complication rates from Watchman implantation are around 1.9-8.7% 1, 3
  • Chest wall pain of various etiologies affects 20-40% of the general population in their lifetime 4

Significant Causes of Post-Watchman Chest Pain

1. Pericardial Effusion/Tamponade

  • Most serious cause requiring immediate attention
  • Occurs in 0.68-7.1% of cases 1, 2
  • Typically presents within hours to days after the procedure
  • May be accompanied by hypotension, tachycardia, and muffled heart sounds
  • Requires urgent echocardiographic assessment and potential pericardiocentesis

2. Device-Related Thrombus (DRT)

  • Occurs in approximately 2-5% of patients 4, 2
  • Risk factors include:
    • Non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (OR 1.90-2.24)
    • Renal insufficiency (OR 4.02)
    • History of TIA or stroke (OR 2.31)
    • Deep device implantation (OR 2.41)
    • Left ventricular dysfunction
    • Incomplete LAA sealing 4
  • High-grade hypoattenuated thickening significantly increases stroke risk (HR 4.6) 4

3. Incomplete LAA Occlusion/Peridevice Leak

  • Relatively common, occurring in 26-57% of patients depending on imaging technique 4, 5
  • Study found peridevice gaps in 27.6% of patients immediately post-procedure, increasing to 34.5% at 12 months 5
  • Associated with increased risk of thromboembolism and potential chest discomfort

4. Device Embolization

  • Rare but serious complication
  • Can migrate to various locations including the aorta 6
  • May present with chest pain, abdominal pain, or symptoms related to the site of embolization
  • Requires urgent intervention

5. Musculoskeletal Pain

  • Common cause of chest pain in general population (42% of non-traumatic chest pain) 4
  • May be related to procedural positioning or exacerbation of pre-existing conditions
  • Usually responds to conservative management

Evaluation Algorithm for Post-Watchman Chest Pain

  1. Immediate Assessment:

    • Vital signs with focus on hypotension, tachycardia
    • ECG to rule out ischemia
    • Focused cardiac examination for signs of tamponade
  2. Risk Stratification:

    • High Risk (requires immediate action):
      • Hypotension
      • New pericardial rub
      • ECG changes
      • Severe, persistent pain
    • Moderate Risk:
      • Stable vital signs with persistent pain
      • Recent procedure (within 7 days)
    • Low Risk:
      • Stable vital signs
      • Mild, intermittent pain
      • Later presentation (>7 days post-procedure)
  3. Diagnostic Approach:

    • High Risk: Immediate echocardiogram (preferably TEE) to assess for:
      • Pericardial effusion
      • Device position and stability
      • Evidence of thrombus
    • Moderate Risk:
      • Echocardiogram within 24 hours
      • Consider CT chest if echocardiogram negative
    • Low Risk:
      • Outpatient echocardiogram
      • Consider chest X-ray

Management Considerations

  • Pericardial Effusion: Urgent pericardiocentesis if hemodynamically significant
  • Device-Related Thrombus: Anticoagulation according to guidelines
  • Peridevice Leak: May require intensification of antithrombotic therapy
  • Device Embolization: Surgical or percutaneous retrieval
  • Musculoskeletal Pain: Conservative management with analgesics

Pitfalls and Caveats

  1. Don't dismiss chest pain as benign in post-Watchman patients without thorough evaluation
  2. Don't delay echocardiography when pericardial effusion is suspected
  3. Be aware of anticoagulation status - patients are typically on warfarin plus aspirin for 45 days post-procedure, then dual antiplatelet therapy until 6 months 2
  4. Consider device-related thrombus even in patients with appropriate anticoagulation
  5. Remember that peridevice leaks can develop over time - a normal initial evaluation doesn't rule out future complications 5

Chest pain after Watchman device placement requires careful evaluation to distinguish between life-threatening complications and benign causes. The most concerning causes include pericardial effusion, device-related thrombus, and device embolization, all of which require prompt diagnosis and management to prevent adverse outcomes.

References

Research

Utilization and procedural adverse outcomes associated with Watchman device implantation.

Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology, 2021

Guideline

Anticoagulation Management After Watchman Procedure

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.