What is the incidence rate of epiretinal membrane development throughout a lifetime?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: September 4, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Incidence Rate of Epiretinal Membrane Development Throughout Lifetime

The incidence rate of epiretinal membrane (ERM) is approximately 9.42 per 100 eye-years, corresponding to a 5-year cumulative incidence of 37.6% in elderly populations, with prevalence increasing dramatically with age from 1.9% in those under 60 to over 11% in those 70-79 years old. 1

Prevalence and Incidence Patterns

Age-Related Prevalence

  • Prevalence increases significantly with age 2:
    • 1.9% in persons younger than 60 years
    • 7.2% in persons 60-69 years
    • 11.6% in persons 70-79 years
    • 9.3% in persons 80 years and older

Overall Prevalence

  • Estimated to affect approximately 30 million adults in the United States aged 43-86 years 2
  • Bilateral in 20-35% of cases 2
  • Prevalence varies significantly by population:
    • Low: 2.2-3.4% in Chinese populations 2
    • Moderate: 7-8.9% in Australian populations 2, 3
    • High: 18.8-28.9% among Latinos in Los Angeles and in multi-ethnic U.S. studies 2
    • Very high: 34.1% in elderly populations (mean age 74.1 years) when assessed with SD-OCT 2

Incidence Rates

  • 5-year cumulative incidence of 5.3% (95% CI 4.4-6.4) for new ERM development in previously unaffected individuals 4
  • Higher incidence rate of 9.42 per 100 eye-years in more recent studies using spectral-domain OCT 1
  • 13.5% 5-year risk of developing ERM in the second eye when one eye is already affected 4

ERM Types and Progression

Types of ERM

  • Cellophane macular reflex (CMR): Early asymptomatic form without retinal folds
    • Prevalence: 1.8-25.1% depending on population 2
  • Preretinal macular fibrosis (PMF): More severe form with retinal folds
    • Prevalence: 0.7-3.9% across different populations 2

Natural History

  • Progression from CMR to PMF occurs in approximately 9.3% of eyes over 5 years 4
  • Existing ERMs show variable course over 5 years 4:
    • Progress in 28.6% of cases
    • Regress in 25.7% of cases
    • Remain stable in 38.8% of cases
  • 5-year cumulative progression rate of 6.9% in recent studies 1

Risk Factors

Established Risk Factors

  • Age: Most consistent and significant risk factor across all studies 2
  • Ethnicity: Varies by population, with highest rates in Chinese Americans (39.0%), followed by Hispanics (29.3%), whites (27.5%), and lowest in blacks (26.2%) 2
  • Vitreous status: Vitreomacular or vitreopapillary adhesion increases risk (HR 2.15) 1
  • Contralateral eye involvement: Significantly increases risk of developing ERM in the second eye 1
  • Ocular conditions:
    • Cataract surgery (9.1% incidence vs. 4.9% in non-surgical eyes) 4
    • Retinal vascular disease (particularly retinal vein occlusions) 2
    • Uveitis and ocular inflammatory diseases 2
    • Retinal breaks 2
    • Diabetic retinopathy 2

Other Potential Risk Factors

  • Choroidal thinning 1
  • Smoking after age 85 (HR 6.01) 1
  • Diabetes and hypercholesterolemia (associated with cellophane maculopathy) 2

Clinical Implications

  • Most ERMs remain relatively stable and asymptomatic, not requiring treatment 5
  • Approximately 80% of patients with symptomatic ERMs improve by at least 2 lines of visual acuity after vitrectomy surgery 5, 6
  • PMF has a small but significant effect on visual acuity, while CMR generally does not affect vision 3
  • In patients with vitreomacular traction of 1500 μm or less, spontaneous release occurs in approximately 30-40% of eyes over 1-2 years 5

Diagnostic Considerations

  • OCT is the diagnostic method of choice for classifying ERMs 5
  • OCT findings include:
    • Hyperreflective irregular layer on inner retinal surface
    • Retinal folds
    • Macular thickening
    • Possible cystic spaces in various retinal layers
    • Elevation of normal foveal depression

The high variability in reported prevalence rates across studies is likely due to differences in imaging modalities (with SD-OCT detecting more cases), classification criteria, and population characteristics including age and ethnicity 2, 1.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Diagnosis and Management of Epirretinal Membranes

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Complications of surgery for epiretinal membranes.

Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 1998

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.