Confirmatory Testing for Abnormal Hemoglobin Results
When an abnormal hemoglobin result is detected, laboratories should verify the finding by repeat testing using a different analytical method, such as high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), capillary electrophoresis, or molecular genetic testing. 1
Primary Confirmatory Tests
Repeat Testing with Different Methodology
The primary approach to confirming abnormal hemoglobin results involves:
Repeat testing of the same specimen - This is mandatory for:
- Results below the lower limit of the reference interval
- Results greater than 15% (140 mmol/mol) HbA1c
- Any result that doesn't correlate with clinical impression 1
Use of a different analytical principle - The repeat measurement should use a method based on a different analytical principle than the initial assay 1. Options include:
- If initial test was charge-based (cation-exchange chromatography, electrophoresis), use a structural-based method
- If initial test was structural-based (affinity chromatography, immunoassay), use a charge-based method 1
Specific Confirmatory Methods
Boronate affinity chromatography - Particularly useful when hemoglobin variants are suspected, as this method is less affected by hemoglobin variants than ion-exchange methods 1
Capillary electrophoresis - Provides excellent resolution for detecting various hemoglobin variants 2
HPLC with different column chemistry - Using a different column chemistry can help confirm the presence of variants 3
Secondary Confirmatory Tests
If the primary confirmatory test still shows abnormal results, additional testing may include:
Comparison with other glycated protein assays - Testing fructosamine or glycated albumin can provide supporting evidence when HbA1c results are questionable 1
Molecular genetic testing - For definitive identification of hemoglobin variants:
- PCR-based methods like Amplification Refractory Mutation System (ARMS)
- DNA sequencing for specific mutations 4
When to Suspect Hemoglobin Variants
Suspect a hemoglobin variant when:
- HbA1c reading is surprisingly high or low
- HbA1c result changes significantly when laboratory method changes
- Patient has known hemoglobinopathy or family history of one
- Patient belongs to an ethnic group with higher prevalence of hemoglobinopathies 1
Algorithm for Confirmatory Testing
- Initial abnormal result detected
- Repeat test using same method to rule out technical error
- If confirmed abnormal, test using different analytical principle
- If still abnormal:
- Compare with clinical picture and glucose measurements
- Consider additional testing (fructosamine, glycated albumin)
- Consider referral for molecular genetic testing if hemoglobinopathy suspected
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
Relying on a single method - Different methods have different interferences with hemoglobin variants 1
Ignoring clinical correlation - Always compare HbA1c results with clinical impression and other glucose measurements 1
Overlooking concurrent conditions - Conditions affecting red cell turnover (anemia, blood loss, hemolysis) can affect HbA1c independent of the testing method 1
Missing nutritional deficiencies - Iron deficiency can decrease HbA1c while megaloblastic anemia can increase it, potentially confounding results 5
By following this approach, laboratories can satisfy regulatory requirements for confirming abnormal hemoglobin results while ensuring accurate patient diagnosis and appropriate clinical management.