What is the most common form of von Willebrand disease (VWD)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: September 6, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Most Common Form of von Willebrand Disease

Type 1 von Willebrand disease is the most common form, accounting for approximately 75% of all symptomatic cases. 1

Classification of von Willebrand Disease Types

Von Willebrand disease (VWD) is the most common inherited bleeding disorder, affecting up to 1% of the general population. The disease is categorized into three main types:

  • Type 1: Partial quantitative deficiency of von Willebrand factor (VWF)

    • Represents ~75% of all symptomatic VWD cases 1
    • Characterized by mild to moderate bleeding symptoms
    • Typically responds well to desmopressin
  • Type 2: Qualitative deficiency of VWF with four subtypes:

    • Type 2A: Most common Type 2 variant 1
    • Type 2B: Less common than 2A
    • Type 2M: Less common than 2A
    • Type 2N: Less common than 2A
  • Type 3: Virtually complete quantitative deficiency of VWF

    • Very rare (approximately 1 in 1,000 people) 1
    • Associated with severe bleeding symptoms
  • Acquired von Willebrand Syndrome (AVWS):

    • Less common than hereditary forms 1
    • Associated with specific medical conditions rather than genetic inheritance

Clinical Significance

The prevalence of different VWD types has important clinical implications:

  • Type 1 VWD patients typically present with milder bleeding symptoms compared to Type 3 patients 1, 2
  • Bleeding manifestations commonly include:
    • Mucocutaneous bleeding (nosebleeds, bruising)
    • Bleeding from minor wounds
    • Heavy menstrual bleeding in women
    • Bleeding following surgery or invasive procedures

Diagnostic Considerations

Accurate diagnosis of VWD type is essential for appropriate management:

  • Multiple assays are needed to assess VWF levels and function 3
  • Type 1 diagnosis can be challenging due to:
    • Variable VWF levels influenced by genetic and non-genetic factors 4
    • Lack of consensus on laboratory cut-off values 4
    • Overlap between healthy individuals and those with mild VWD 4

Treatment Approach

Treatment strategies differ based on VWD type:

  • Type 1 VWD often responds well to desmopressin 3, 2
  • Type 3 VWD typically requires VWF replacement therapy 2
  • Women with Type 1 VWD experiencing heavy menstrual bleeding may benefit from hormonal therapies 5, 3

Key Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Misdiagnosis is common due to complex diagnostic criteria and variable bleeding symptoms 2
  • VWF levels can fluctuate due to blood group, exercise, thyroid hormones, estrogens, and aging 2
  • Low VWF levels (30-50 IU/dL) may represent a diagnostic challenge, as not all individuals with these levels experience bleeding symptoms 6

In summary, Type 1 VWD is by far the most common form of von Willebrand disease, representing approximately three-quarters of all symptomatic cases, while Type 2 variants (particularly 2A) account for most of the remaining cases, and Type 3 is extremely rare.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

von Willebrand disease.

Nature reviews. Disease primers, 2024

Research

von Willebrand disease: Diagnosis and treatment, treatment of women, and genomic approach to diagnosis.

Haemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of Hemophilia, 2021

Research

Controversies in the diagnosis of Type 1 von Willebrand disease.

International journal of laboratory hematology, 2017

Guideline

Hormone Replacement Therapy in Von Willebrand Disease

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.