Repeat Biopsy Protocol for Gleason 6 Prostate Cancer
For patients with Gleason 6 prostate cancer on active surveillance, prostate biopsy should be performed annually to assess for disease progression, as PSA kinetics alone are not reliable for determining progression of disease. 1
Recommended Biopsy Schedule for Active Surveillance
Initial Follow-up:
- A repeat prostate biopsy should be performed within 6 months of diagnosis if:
- Initial biopsy was <10 cores, or
- Assessment was discordant (e.g., palpable tumor contralateral to side of positive biopsy) 1
Subsequent Follow-up:
- Annual prostate biopsy is recommended to assess for disease progression 1
- Some protocols suggest biopsy at year 1, then every 3 years until 80 years of age 1
- The NCCN guidelines specifically state that repeat biopsies are not indicated when life expectancy is <10 years 1
Rationale for Regular Biopsies
Regular biopsies are crucial because:
- PSA kinetics alone are unreliable for determining disease progression 1
- 22-41% of patients with biopsy Gleason 6 are upgraded to Gleason ≥7 at radical prostatectomy 2, 3
- Patients who are upgraded have significantly higher risk for:
- Extraprostatic extension (22% vs 4%, p<0.01)
- Seminal vesicle invasion (9% vs 2%, p<0.01)
- Biochemical recurrence (10% vs 3%, p<0.01) 3
Indicators of Disease Progression
Biopsy findings that indicate progression include:
- Gleason grade 4 or 5 cancer found on repeat biopsy
- Cancer found in a greater number of biopsy cores
- Cancer occupying a greater extent of biopsy cores 1
Risk Factors for Upgrading
Patients with these factors should be monitored particularly closely:
- PSA >5.0 ng/ml
- Prostate weight ≤60 gm
- Cancer involving >5% of biopsy tissue
- Cancer in >1 biopsy core
- Cancer involving >10% of any core 4
Practical Considerations
- Follow-up should be more rigorous in younger men than in older men 1
- Repeat biopsies are not indicated when life expectancy is <10 years 1
- Consider the potential anxiety and complications associated with repeated biopsies when determining frequency
Pitfalls to Avoid
- Relying solely on PSA: PSA doubling time is not reliable enough as a standalone monitoring parameter 1
- Insufficient sampling: Initial inadequate sampling (<10 cores) may miss higher-grade disease 5
- Ignoring minimal cancer: Even small foci of cancer can harbor more aggressive disease 6
- Delaying intervention: About 25% of patients on active surveillance protocols eventually require intervention 1
Following this protocol allows for early detection of disease progression while minimizing unnecessary procedures in patients with stable, low-risk disease.