Which physical maneuver is most likely to assist in reducing the risk of future falls for a healthy 68-year-old man?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: September 8, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Fall Risk Assessment in Older Adults: Get-up-and-go Test is Most Effective

The get-up-and-go test (option C) is the most likely physical maneuver to assist in assessing the risk of future falls for a healthy 68-year-old man. 1, 2

Evidence for Get-up-and-go Test

The get-up-and-go test is specifically designed to evaluate functional mobility in older adults, which is a key predictor of fall risk. This test involves:

  • Having the patient rise from a chair
  • Walk 3 meters
  • Turn around
  • Return to the chair and sit down

The timed version of this test (TUG) has been extensively validated and:

  • Correlates well with balance scales (r = -0.81) and gait speed (r = -0.61) 2
  • Demonstrates high specificity (89.5%) for predicting falls 3
  • Is quick, requires no special equipment, and can be easily incorporated into routine examinations 2

Why Other Options Are Less Effective

  1. Test for nystagmus (option A): While vestibular disorders can contribute to falls, nystagmus testing alone is not a comprehensive fall risk assessment tool for the general elderly population. Guidelines do not recommend this as a primary screening tool for fall risk 1.

  2. Test for pulsus paradoxus (option B): This test primarily assesses cardiac and respiratory conditions and has no established relationship with fall risk assessment in the elderly 1.

  3. Lumbar spine flexibility test (option D): While mobility limitations can contribute to falls, this specific test is not identified in guidelines as a validated fall risk assessment tool 4, 1.

Evidence-Based Fall Risk Assessment

The US Preventive Services Task Force and other guidelines recommend:

  • Using history of prior falls as the most consistent predictor of future falls 4, 1
  • Assessing physical function or mobility limitations as key risk factors 4
  • Implementing exercise interventions, particularly those focusing on balance and functional exercises, which reduce falls by 23-25% 4, 1

Clinical Application

For a healthy 68-year-old man:

  • The get-up-and-go test provides objective data about functional mobility
  • A TUG time ≥12.6 seconds is associated with significantly higher fall risk (adjusted OR = 3.94) 3
  • The test has high specificity (89.5%) and negative predictive value (81.4%), making it particularly useful for identifying those at higher risk 3

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Relying solely on chronological age rather than functional assessment
  • Failing to perform objective mobility testing in seemingly "healthy" older adults
  • Not following up with appropriate interventions if mobility impairment is detected
  • Overlooking the importance of balance and functional exercises in fall prevention

The get-up-and-go test is recommended as part of a comprehensive fall risk assessment and serves as an excellent starting point for evaluating fall risk in community-dwelling older adults like this 68-year-old man 1, 2.

References

Guideline

Fall Prevention in Elderly Adults

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

The timed "Up & Go": a test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons.

Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 1991

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.