What is the diagnostic workup for hematuria (blood in urine) in males?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: September 10, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Diagnostic Workup for Hematuria in Males

The diagnostic workup for hematuria in males should follow a risk-stratified approach, with all males over 60 years, those with risk factors, or those with gross hematuria requiring comprehensive evaluation including cystoscopy and upper tract imaging. 1

Initial Assessment and Risk Stratification

Classification of Hematuria

  • Gross hematuria (macroscopic): Visible blood in urine - highest risk for malignancy (>10%)
  • Microscopic hematuria:
    • ≥3 RBCs per high-power field on microscopic examination
    • Further stratified by:
      • <5 RBCs/HPF (lower risk)
      • ≥5 RBCs/HPF (higher risk)

Risk Factors for Urologic Malignancy

  • Age >60 years
  • Male sex
  • Smoking history
  • Occupational exposure to chemicals or dyes (benzenes, aromatic amines)
  • History of gross hematuria
  • History of urologic disorder or disease
  • History of pelvic irradiation
  • Family history of renal cell carcinoma or urothelial carcinoma
  • Chronic urinary tract infection
  • Exposure to cyclophosphamide or aristolochic acid

Diagnostic Algorithm

Step 1: Initial Laboratory Evaluation

  • Urinalysis with microscopy to confirm hematuria and assess for:
    • Pyuria, bacteriuria (suggesting infection)
    • RBC morphology (dysmorphic RBCs suggest glomerular source)
    • Proteinuria (suggesting renal disease)
    • Crystals or casts
  • Urine culture to rule out infection
  • Complete metabolic panel (BUN, creatinine, electrolytes)
  • Complete blood count
  • Serum PSA in men over 40 years

Step 2: Risk-Based Evaluation

Low-Risk Patients

Age ≤40 years, <5 RBCs/HPF, no risk factors

  • Repeat urinalysis in 3 months
  • If resolved: No further workup needed
  • If persistent: Consider renal ultrasound

Intermediate/High-Risk Patients

Age >40 years, ≥5 RBCs/HPF, or risk factors present

  • Upper Tract Imaging (one of the following):
    • CT urography (preferred for most patients)
    • MR urography (for patients with renal insufficiency or contrast allergy)
    • Renal ultrasound (for younger patients or as initial screening)
  • Cystoscopy (essential for all high-risk patients)
    • The American Urological Association recommends cystoscopy for all patients with persistent microscopic hematuria after negative initial evaluation 2
  • Urine Cytology for patients with:
    • Irritative voiding symptoms
    • Risk factors for carcinoma in situ
    • History of smoking

Step 3: Additional Evaluation Based on Findings

For Suspected Glomerular Source

Dysmorphic RBCs, proteinuria, casts, or elevated creatinine

  • Urine protein quantification
  • Serum albumin and total protein
  • Consider nephrology referral if:
    • Significant proteinuria
    • Elevated creatinine or BUN
    • eGFR <60 ml/min/1.73m²

For Suspected Urologic Source

Normal-shaped RBCs, no proteinuria, normal renal function

  • Complete urologic evaluation as outlined above
  • Urology referral for:
    • Gross hematuria
    • Abnormal genitourinary anatomy
    • Suspected stones or tumors
    • Persistent microscopic hematuria without proteinuria

Follow-Up Recommendations

After Negative Initial Evaluation

  • For persistent asymptomatic microhematuria after negative urologic workup, yearly urinalyses should be conducted 2
  • Consider repeat evaluation within 3-5 years for persistent or recurrent asymptomatic microhematuria 2

Special Considerations

  • Changes in clinical scenario (increased hematuria, new symptoms) warrant earlier re-evaluation
  • Patients with persistent hematuria attributed to benign conditions (e.g., enlarged prostate with friable vessels) should still undergo annual urinalysis 2

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  1. Ignoring hematuria in patients on anticoagulants - These patients still require complete workup
  2. Attributing hematuria solely to UTI without supporting evidence - Confirm resolution after treatment
  3. Inadequate follow-up - The overwhelming majority of patients with thorough negative initial workup remain cancer-free, but a small proportion may develop disease over time 2
  4. Failure to recognize glomerular sources - Dysmorphic RBCs with proteinuria require nephrology evaluation rather than urologic workup

By following this risk-stratified approach, clinicians can ensure appropriate evaluation of hematuria in male patients while avoiding unnecessary testing in low-risk individuals.

References

Guideline

Evaluation and Management of Microscopic Hematuria

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.