Is it better to treat recovered ejection fraction (EF) with Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme (ACE) inhibitors or Angiotensin Receptor Blockers (ARBs)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: September 11, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Treatment of Recovered Ejection Fraction: ACE Inhibitors vs ARBs

ACE inhibitors should be used as first-line therapy for patients with recovered ejection fraction, with ARBs reserved as an alternative for patients who cannot tolerate ACE inhibitors due to side effects such as cough or angioedema. 1

Evidence-Based Rationale

Efficacy Comparison

  • ACE inhibitors have more robust evidence supporting their use in heart failure patients, including those with recovered EF
  • Both ACE inhibitors and ARBs provide similar benefits in terms of mortality reduction (5-16% risk reduction with ACE inhibitors) 1
  • ACE inhibitors are considered essential treatments for patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction, with ARBs being a reasonable alternative when ACE inhibitors cannot be tolerated 1

Side Effect Profile

  • ACE inhibitors are associated with cough in approximately 5-10% of white patients and up to 50% in Chinese patients 1
  • Angioedema occurs in <1% of patients taking ACE inhibitors but is more frequent in Black patients 1, 2
  • ARBs have a better tolerability profile with fewer side effects like cough 2, 3
  • Both medication classes carry similar risks of hypotension, renal dysfunction, and hyperkalemia 2

Algorithm for Treatment Decision

  1. First-line therapy: Start with an ACE inhibitor at the recommended starting dose

    • Examples: Enalapril 2.5 mg twice daily, Lisinopril 2.5-5 mg daily, Ramipril 1.25-2.5 mg once daily 1
    • Titrate to target doses as tolerated (Enalapril 10-20 mg twice daily, Lisinopril 20-40 mg daily) 1
  2. Monitor for side effects:

    • Persistent dry cough
    • Angioedema (facial/tongue swelling)
    • Hypotension, hyperkalemia, or worsening renal function
  3. Switch to ARB if:

    • Patient develops persistent and troublesome cough that resolves after ACE inhibitor discontinuation 1
    • Patient experiences angioedema (absolute contraindication to further ACE inhibitor use) 1
    • Recommended ARBs: Candesartan 4-8 mg daily (target 32 mg), Valsartan 40 mg twice daily (target 160 mg twice daily) 1
  4. No washout period required when switching from ACE inhibitor to ARB 2

    • Monitor blood pressure, renal function, and potassium within 1-2 weeks after switching

Important Clinical Considerations

  • ARBs should not be combined with ACE inhibitors due to increased risk of adverse effects without additional mortality benefit 2, 3, 4
  • Patients with recovered EF should continue to receive evidence-based therapy that was effective during the reduced EF phase
  • Target doses should be achieved whenever possible, as outcomes are better with higher doses 5
  • Special caution is needed when using either medication class in patients with:
    • Low systolic blood pressure (<80 mmHg)
    • Impaired renal function
    • Elevated serum potassium
    • Volume depletion 2

Monitoring Recommendations

  • Blood pressure, renal function, and serum potassium should be checked within 1-2 weeks after initiation or dose changes 2
  • More frequent monitoring may be needed in patients with renal impairment or those taking other medications that affect potassium levels (e.g., potassium-sparing diuretics) 6
  • Avoid NSAIDs when possible as they may reduce the effectiveness of both ACE inhibitors and ARBs 6

By following this approach, clinicians can optimize therapy for patients with recovered ejection fraction while minimizing adverse effects and maximizing clinical benefits.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.