Treatment of Recovered Ejection Fraction: ACE Inhibitors vs ARBs
ACE inhibitors should be used as first-line therapy for patients with recovered ejection fraction, with ARBs reserved as an alternative for patients who cannot tolerate ACE inhibitors due to side effects such as cough or angioedema. 1
Evidence-Based Rationale
Efficacy Comparison
- ACE inhibitors have more robust evidence supporting their use in heart failure patients, including those with recovered EF
- Both ACE inhibitors and ARBs provide similar benefits in terms of mortality reduction (5-16% risk reduction with ACE inhibitors) 1
- ACE inhibitors are considered essential treatments for patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction, with ARBs being a reasonable alternative when ACE inhibitors cannot be tolerated 1
Side Effect Profile
- ACE inhibitors are associated with cough in approximately 5-10% of white patients and up to 50% in Chinese patients 1
- Angioedema occurs in <1% of patients taking ACE inhibitors but is more frequent in Black patients 1, 2
- ARBs have a better tolerability profile with fewer side effects like cough 2, 3
- Both medication classes carry similar risks of hypotension, renal dysfunction, and hyperkalemia 2
Algorithm for Treatment Decision
First-line therapy: Start with an ACE inhibitor at the recommended starting dose
Monitor for side effects:
- Persistent dry cough
- Angioedema (facial/tongue swelling)
- Hypotension, hyperkalemia, or worsening renal function
Switch to ARB if:
- Patient develops persistent and troublesome cough that resolves after ACE inhibitor discontinuation 1
- Patient experiences angioedema (absolute contraindication to further ACE inhibitor use) 1
- Recommended ARBs: Candesartan 4-8 mg daily (target 32 mg), Valsartan 40 mg twice daily (target 160 mg twice daily) 1
No washout period required when switching from ACE inhibitor to ARB 2
- Monitor blood pressure, renal function, and potassium within 1-2 weeks after switching
Important Clinical Considerations
- ARBs should not be combined with ACE inhibitors due to increased risk of adverse effects without additional mortality benefit 2, 3, 4
- Patients with recovered EF should continue to receive evidence-based therapy that was effective during the reduced EF phase
- Target doses should be achieved whenever possible, as outcomes are better with higher doses 5
- Special caution is needed when using either medication class in patients with:
- Low systolic blood pressure (<80 mmHg)
- Impaired renal function
- Elevated serum potassium
- Volume depletion 2
Monitoring Recommendations
- Blood pressure, renal function, and serum potassium should be checked within 1-2 weeks after initiation or dose changes 2
- More frequent monitoring may be needed in patients with renal impairment or those taking other medications that affect potassium levels (e.g., potassium-sparing diuretics) 6
- Avoid NSAIDs when possible as they may reduce the effectiveness of both ACE inhibitors and ARBs 6
By following this approach, clinicians can optimize therapy for patients with recovered ejection fraction while minimizing adverse effects and maximizing clinical benefits.