Diagnostic Scoring Systems for Pulmonary Embolism in Pregnancy
The modified Wells score with a cutoff of 6 points is the most appropriate scoring system for evaluating suspected pulmonary embolism in pregnancy, especially in patients with a history of DVT. 1
Clinical Approach to PE Diagnosis in Pregnancy
Initial Assessment
- Pregnancy significantly increases PE risk, with PE being a leading cause of maternal mortality in developed countries 2, 3
- Standard clinical prediction rules like Wells or Geneva scores have not been formally validated in pregnancy, but recent evidence supports using the modified Wells score 1
- History of DVT is a significant risk factor that should be incorporated into risk assessment 4
Modified Wells Score in Pregnancy
The modified Wells score has shown excellent performance in pregnancy:
- 100% sensitivity and 90% specificity with a cutoff of ≥6 points 1
- 100% negative predictive value - no patients with a score <6 had PE 1
- Superior to other diagnostic tools like D-dimer, chest X-ray, blood gases, and EKG 1
Key Components of Modified Wells Score
- Clinical symptoms of DVT (3 points)
- Alternative diagnosis less likely than PE (3 points)
- Heart rate >100 beats/min (1.5 points)
- Immobilization or surgery in previous 4 weeks (1.5 points)
- Previous DVT/PE (1.5 points) - particularly relevant for patients with DVT history
- Hemoptysis (1 point)
- Malignancy (1 point)
D-dimer Testing in Pregnancy
- Not recommended for excluding PE in pregnancy 2
- False negatives have been reported in pregnant women with documented PE 2
- Physiologic increases in D-dimer levels during pregnancy limit specificity 2
Diagnostic Algorithm for Pregnant Women with Suspected PE
Apply modified Wells score:
- Score <6: PE unlikely but further testing still warranted given pregnancy status
- Score ≥6: PE likely, proceed with imaging
Assess for DVT symptoms:
- If DVT symptoms present, perform bilateral compression ultrasound (CUS) of lower extremities 2
- Positive CUS: Begin anticoagulation without further imaging
- Negative CUS: Proceed to chest imaging
Chest imaging pathway:
For patients with history of DVT:
- Apply higher vigilance - history of DVT increases PE risk
- Lower threshold for imaging studies
- Consider the DVT history as adding 1.5 points to the Wells score
Special Considerations for Patients with Prior DVT
- Prior DVT increases risk of PE during pregnancy (odds ratio 9.4) 4
- History of superficial vein thrombosis is also a significant risk factor (odds ratio 9.4) 4
- Smoking further increases risk (odds ratio 2.4) and should be assessed 4
- These patients should be considered higher risk regardless of other clinical features
Limitations and Caveats
- The European Society of Cardiology (ESC) notes that data on clinical prediction rules in pregnancy are lacking 2
- Some studies show limited utility of both Wells and Geneva scores in pregnancy 5
- A 2014 retrospective study showed promising results for Wells criteria in pregnancy with 100% sensitivity and negative predictive value 6
- The most recent evidence (2018) suggests neither Wells nor Geneva scores perform optimally in pregnancy 5
- The modified Wells score with a higher cutoff (≥6) shows the most promise 1
Conclusion
For pregnant women with suspected PE, especially those with a history of DVT, the modified Wells score with a cutoff of 6 points offers the best available clinical prediction tool. However, given the potentially fatal consequences of missing PE in pregnancy, a low threshold for imaging is still warranted even with a reassuring score. The diagnostic pathway should include chest X-ray followed by appropriate imaging based on CXR results, with compression ultrasound considered when DVT symptoms are present.