What scoring system can I use to diagnose pulmonary embolism in pregnancy, especially in a patient with a history of Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: September 17, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Diagnostic Scoring Systems for Pulmonary Embolism in Pregnancy

The modified Wells score with a cutoff of 6 points is the most appropriate scoring system for evaluating suspected pulmonary embolism in pregnancy, especially in patients with a history of DVT. 1

Clinical Approach to PE Diagnosis in Pregnancy

Initial Assessment

  • Pregnancy significantly increases PE risk, with PE being a leading cause of maternal mortality in developed countries 2, 3
  • Standard clinical prediction rules like Wells or Geneva scores have not been formally validated in pregnancy, but recent evidence supports using the modified Wells score 1
  • History of DVT is a significant risk factor that should be incorporated into risk assessment 4

Modified Wells Score in Pregnancy

The modified Wells score has shown excellent performance in pregnancy:

  • 100% sensitivity and 90% specificity with a cutoff of ≥6 points 1
  • 100% negative predictive value - no patients with a score <6 had PE 1
  • Superior to other diagnostic tools like D-dimer, chest X-ray, blood gases, and EKG 1

Key Components of Modified Wells Score

  1. Clinical symptoms of DVT (3 points)
  2. Alternative diagnosis less likely than PE (3 points)
  3. Heart rate >100 beats/min (1.5 points)
  4. Immobilization or surgery in previous 4 weeks (1.5 points)
  5. Previous DVT/PE (1.5 points) - particularly relevant for patients with DVT history
  6. Hemoptysis (1 point)
  7. Malignancy (1 point)

D-dimer Testing in Pregnancy

  • Not recommended for excluding PE in pregnancy 2
  • False negatives have been reported in pregnant women with documented PE 2
  • Physiologic increases in D-dimer levels during pregnancy limit specificity 2

Diagnostic Algorithm for Pregnant Women with Suspected PE

  1. Apply modified Wells score:

    • Score <6: PE unlikely but further testing still warranted given pregnancy status
    • Score ≥6: PE likely, proceed with imaging
  2. Assess for DVT symptoms:

    • If DVT symptoms present, perform bilateral compression ultrasound (CUS) of lower extremities 2
    • Positive CUS: Begin anticoagulation without further imaging
    • Negative CUS: Proceed to chest imaging
  3. Chest imaging pathway:

    • First obtain chest X-ray 2, 3
    • If CXR normal: Proceed with V/Q scan 2, 3
    • If CXR abnormal: Proceed with CTPA 2, 3
    • If V/Q scan non-diagnostic: Proceed with CTPA 2, 3
  4. For patients with history of DVT:

    • Apply higher vigilance - history of DVT increases PE risk
    • Lower threshold for imaging studies
    • Consider the DVT history as adding 1.5 points to the Wells score

Special Considerations for Patients with Prior DVT

  • Prior DVT increases risk of PE during pregnancy (odds ratio 9.4) 4
  • History of superficial vein thrombosis is also a significant risk factor (odds ratio 9.4) 4
  • Smoking further increases risk (odds ratio 2.4) and should be assessed 4
  • These patients should be considered higher risk regardless of other clinical features

Limitations and Caveats

  • The European Society of Cardiology (ESC) notes that data on clinical prediction rules in pregnancy are lacking 2
  • Some studies show limited utility of both Wells and Geneva scores in pregnancy 5
  • A 2014 retrospective study showed promising results for Wells criteria in pregnancy with 100% sensitivity and negative predictive value 6
  • The most recent evidence (2018) suggests neither Wells nor Geneva scores perform optimally in pregnancy 5
  • The modified Wells score with a higher cutoff (≥6) shows the most promise 1

Conclusion

For pregnant women with suspected PE, especially those with a history of DVT, the modified Wells score with a cutoff of 6 points offers the best available clinical prediction tool. However, given the potentially fatal consequences of missing PE in pregnancy, a low threshold for imaging is still warranted even with a reassuring score. The diagnostic pathway should include chest X-ray followed by appropriate imaging based on CXR results, with compression ultrasound considered when DVT symptoms are present.

References

Research

The application of a clinical risk stratification score may reduce unnecessary investigations for pulmonary embolism in pregnancy.

The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians, 2011

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Diagnosis and Management of Pulmonary Embolism in Pregnant Women

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Are the Wells Score and the Revised Geneva Score valuable for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism in pregnancy?

European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology, 2018

Research

The utility of the Wells clinical prediction model and ventilation-perfusion scanning for pulmonary embolism diagnosis in pregnancy.

Blood coagulation & fibrinolysis : an international journal in haemostasis and thrombosis, 2014

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.