Management of Metal Foreign Body Ingestion
Endoscopy is recommended as first-line treatment for persistent esophageal foreign bodies, with timing based on the type of object and clinical presentation. 1
Initial Assessment and Diagnostic Workup
Clinical Evaluation
- Assess for symptoms: dysphagia, odynophagia, inability to swallow saliva, retrosternal pain, foreign body sensation, vomiting, drooling
- Check for signs of complications: fever, cervical subcutaneous emphysema, neck tenderness
- Evaluate for respiratory symptoms: choking, stridor, dyspnea (indicating possible airway obstruction)
Laboratory Tests
- Complete blood count (CBC)
- C-reactive protein (CRP)
- Blood gas analysis for base excess and lactate 1
Imaging
Plain Radiographs:
- Obtain neck, chest, and abdominal radiographs to assess presence, location, size, shape, and number of metal objects
- Include biplanar radiography with lateral projection to differentiate between tracheobronchial and esophageal foreign bodies
- Note: Plain radiography has up to 47% false-negative rate for radiopaque objects 1
CT Scan:
- Perform CT scan if perforation or other complications are suspected
- Essential when plain radiographs are negative but clinical suspicion remains high
- Sensitivity of 90-100% and specificity of 93.7-100% 1
Avoid Contrast Studies:
- Contrast swallow is not recommended as it may coat the foreign body and impair endoscopic visualization
- Risk of aspiration in patients with complete esophageal obstruction 1
Management Algorithm
Timing of Endoscopic Intervention
Emergent Endoscopy (within 2-6 hours):
- Sharp-pointed metal objects (high risk of perforation, up to 35%)
- Batteries
- Magnets
- Objects causing complete esophageal obstruction 1
Urgent Endoscopy (within 24 hours):
- Other esophageal foreign bodies without complete obstruction 1
Observation:
- 80-90% of ingested foreign bodies pass spontaneously through the GI tract
- Consider observation for small, blunt metal objects that have passed into the stomach in asymptomatic patients 2
Endoscopic Techniques
- Flexible endoscopy: First-line approach for most foreign bodies
- Rigid endoscopy: Consider as second-line therapy, particularly for objects in upper esophagus 1
- Retrieval tools: Use baskets, snares, and grasping forceps for removal of sharp-pointed objects 1
Special Considerations
- Sharp objects: Require prompt removal due to high risk of perforation
- Magnets: Require urgent removal as they can attract each other across bowel walls causing pressure necrosis, perforation, and fistula formation 1, 3
- Batteries: Need immediate removal due to risk of electrical burns, pressure necrosis, and chemical injury 1
Post-Removal Management
- Evaluate for underlying esophageal disorders (present in up to 25% of cases)
- Common conditions: esophageal stricture, hiatus hernia, esophageal web, Schatzki ring, eosinophilic esophagitis, achalasia, tumors 1
- Consider histological evaluation to rule out underlying pathology
- Monitor for complications: perforation, bleeding, infection
High-Risk Populations
- Patients with mental illness or intellectual disability require closer monitoring as they are at higher risk for foreign body ingestion 4, 3
- Patients with previous abdominal surgery (adhesions) or intestinal disease (Crohn's, stenosis) have higher risk of complications 2
Follow-up
- Clinical follow-up to ensure resolution of symptoms
- Repeat imaging if foreign body was not retrieved and has not passed naturally
- Psychiatric evaluation for patients with intentional ingestion 1
Complications to Monitor
- Perforation
- Obstruction
- Hemorrhage
- Abscess formation
- Fistula formation
- Stricture development (in cases with mucosal injury)
Remember that early intervention for sharp metal objects is crucial to prevent life-threatening complications such as perforation, which can lead to mediastinitis, peritonitis, or abscess formation.