At what Frax (Fracture Risk Assessment Tool) score should treatment for osteoporosis be considered based on bone density?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: September 19, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

FRAX Score Thresholds for Osteoporosis Treatment Based on Bone Mineral Density

Treatment for osteoporosis should be initiated when the FRAX 10-year probability is ≥20% for major osteoporotic fracture or ≥3% for hip fracture, regardless of T-score, or when T-score is ≤-2.5 at any major site. 1, 2

Fracture Risk Categories and Treatment Thresholds

High Fracture Risk (Treatment Recommended)

  • T-score ≤-2.5 at any major site (spine, hip, or forearm)
  • Prior osteoporotic fracture
  • FRAX 10-year probability of major osteoporotic fracture ≥20%
  • FRAX 10-year probability of hip fracture ≥3%

Moderate Fracture Risk (Consider Treatment)

  • FRAX 10-year probability of major osteoporotic fracture 10-19%
  • FRAX 10-year probability of hip fracture >1% and <3%
  • T-scores in the osteopenic range (-1.0 to -2.4) with additional risk factors

Low Fracture Risk (No Treatment)

  • FRAX 10-year probability of major osteoporotic fracture <10%
  • FRAX 10-year probability of hip fracture ≤1%

Special Considerations for FRAX Interpretation

Glucocorticoid Users

For patients on glucocorticoid therapy, FRAX scores should be adjusted:

  • Increase the risk generated with FRAX by 1.15 for major osteoporotic fracture
  • Increase the risk generated with FRAX by 1.2 for hip fracture if glucocorticoid dose is >7.5 mg/day 1

For example, if hip fracture risk is 2.0%, increase to 2.4% for patients on significant glucocorticoid therapy.

Age Considerations

  • FRAX algorithm is country-specific and intended for previously untreated postmenopausal women and men aged 40-90 years 1
  • For patients <40 years, different criteria apply, focusing on Z-scores and presence of fractures 1

Clinical Implementation

Diagnostic Approach

  1. Measure BMD via DXA at lumbar spine and hip (femoral neck and total hip)
  2. Calculate FRAX score incorporating BMD when available
  3. Identify presence of prior fragility fractures
  4. Assess for secondary causes of osteoporosis

Important Caveats

  • Approximately 60% of osteoporotic fractures occur in patients with T-scores higher than -2.5, emphasizing the importance of FRAX assessment even in osteopenic patients 2
  • The risk of subsequent fracture is highest immediately after an index fracture, necessitating prompt intervention 2
  • FRAX can still be used to predict fracture probability in women currently or previously treated for osteoporosis, though it should not be used to assess treatment effectiveness 3

Potential Discordance

  • FRAX scores with and without BMD may yield discordant results in approximately 16% of cases 4
  • Discordance is more common in elderly patients, those with lower BMD, and when FRAX without BMD is near the intervention threshold 4
  • When discordance occurs, treatment decisions should prioritize FRAX with BMD when available

Treatment Selection Based on Risk Category

High Risk

  • First-line: Oral bisphosphonates (alendronate, risedronate)
  • Alternative: IV bisphosphonate (zoledronic acid) or denosumab if oral medications are contraindicated

Very High Risk

  • Consider anabolic agents (teriparatide, abaloparatide, romosozumab) followed by antiresorptive therapy, especially for:
    • Recent vertebral fractures
    • Multiple fractures
    • T-score ≤-3.5
    • FRAX ≥30% for major osteoporotic fracture or ≥4.5% for hip fracture 2, 5

By following these evidence-based thresholds for initiating treatment based on FRAX scores and BMD, clinicians can appropriately identify patients who would benefit from osteoporosis therapy to reduce fracture risk and associated morbidity and mortality.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Osteoporosis Management

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Does osteoporosis therapy invalidate FRAX for fracture prediction?

Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research, 2012

Research

Osteoporosis: A Review.

JAMA, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.