What type of contrast is used for an MR arthrogram to diagnose a HAGL lesion, intravenous or intraarticular?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: September 20, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

MR Arthrogram for HAGL Lesion: Intraarticular Contrast is Required

For diagnosing a humeral avulsion of glenohumeral ligament (HAGL) lesion, direct MR arthrography with intraarticular contrast injection is the preferred imaging technique rather than intravenous contrast. 1

Rationale for Intraarticular Contrast

MR arthrography with direct intraarticular injection of contrast provides several advantages for HAGL lesion diagnosis:

  • Superior visualization: Intraarticular contrast distends the joint capsule and outlines the glenohumeral ligaments, particularly the inferior glenohumeral ligament complex where HAGL lesions occur 1, 2
  • Improved diagnostic accuracy: Direct MR arthrography has higher sensitivity and specificity for detecting ligamentous injuries compared to non-contrast MRI or indirect MR arthrography 1
  • Better delineation: The contrast outlines tears and avulsions, making them more conspicuous 2, 3

Technical Considerations

When performing MR arthrography for suspected HAGL lesion:

  • A dilute solution of gadolinium chelate (typically 1:200 dilution) is injected directly into the glenohumeral joint 1
  • Fluoroscopic guidance is recommended for accurate needle placement 1
  • Comparison of MR images with fluoroscopic images is essential for proper interpretation 1
  • The radiocarpal injection is most common, but if there is concern for an ulnar-sided detachment, additional DRUJ injection should be considered 1

Diagnostic Challenges

Despite its advantages, MR arthrography for HAGL lesions has some limitations:

  • False positives: Some MRI findings classically associated with HAGL may represent other abnormalities of the inferior glenohumeral ligament complex 4
  • Specific features: To distinguish true HAGL lesions from iatrogenic extravasation during contrast injection, look for:
    • Anterior band disruption (100% specific for true tears)
    • Thickened ligament margins (>3mm)
    • Scarred appearance at torn margins 3

Associated Injuries

HAGL lesions rarely occur in isolation. Be vigilant for commonly associated injuries:

  • Rotator cuff tears (present in up to 40% of cases) 5, 6
  • Bankart lesions 6, 7
  • Hill-Sachs lesions 6
  • Osteochondral injuries of the humeral head 6

Clinical Implications

Early and accurate diagnosis of HAGL lesions is critical as:

  • They occur in approximately 9.3% of cases with anterior shoulder instability 7
  • Most HAGL lesions cause recurrent instability and require surgical repair 2
  • Arthroscopic or open surgical repair yields excellent outcomes when properly diagnosed 2

In summary, direct MR arthrography with intraarticular contrast is the imaging modality of choice for diagnosing HAGL lesions, providing superior visualization of the glenohumeral ligament complex compared to intravenous contrast techniques.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Humeral avulsion of glenohumeral ligaments.

The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 2011

Guideline

Management of Humeral Tuberosity Fractures

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Humeral avulsion of glenohumeral ligaments as a cause of anterior shoulder instability.

Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association, 1995

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.