What are the primary pharmacological drug classes for symptomatic patients with a Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) of 35-40%?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: September 23, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Primary Pharmacological Drug Classes for Symptomatic HF with EF 35-40%

According to the 2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA Guideline for Management of Heart Failure, the two primary pharmacological drug classes that should be considered for all symptomatic patients with an EF of 35-40% because of reduction in morbidity and mortality are ACE inhibitors/ARBs (or preferably ARNI) and beta-blockers. 1, 2

Core Medication Classes for HFrEF (EF 35-40%)

The 2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA guideline recommends four core medication classes for patients with HFrEF (which includes patients with EF 35-40%):

  1. ACE inhibitors/ARBs or preferably ARNI (Angiotensin Receptor-Neprilysin Inhibitor)

    • Sacubitril/valsartan (ARNI) is now preferred over ACE inhibitors or ARBs as first-line therapy 2
    • ACE inhibitors like enalapril reduce mortality and hospitalization in HFrEF patients 3
    • ARBs are recommended for patients intolerant to ACE inhibitors 1
  2. Beta-blockers

    • Specifically carvedilol, metoprolol succinate, or bisoprolol 2
    • Recommended for all patients with current or prior symptoms of HFrEF to reduce morbidity and mortality 1
  3. Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists (MRAs)

    • Spironolactone or eplerenone
    • Recommended for patients who remain symptomatic despite treatment with an ACE inhibitor/ARB and a beta-blocker 1
  4. SGLT2 inhibitors

    • Dapagliflozin or empagliflozin
    • Recommended regardless of diabetic status 2

Evidence for Mortality and Morbidity Reduction

The strongest evidence for mortality and morbidity reduction in HFrEF patients with EF 35-40% comes from:

  • ACE inhibitors/ARBs: In the SOLVD-Treatment trial, enalapril was associated with an 11% reduction in all-cause mortality and a 30% reduction in hospitalization for heart failure in patients with EF ≤35% 3

  • Beta-blockers: Evidence-based beta-blockers have demonstrated mortality reduction in patients with reduced LVEF, particularly after myocardial infarction 4

  • Combination therapy: The combination of ACE inhibitors and beta-blockers provides additional benefit compared to either medication alone, with hazard ratios of 0.80 for ACE inhibitors, 0.76 for beta-blockers, and 0.68 for the combination 4

Implementation Considerations

  • Start all four core medication classes simultaneously rather than sequentially 2
  • Begin with lower doses and titrate to target doses as tolerated:
    • Sacubitril/valsartan: Start 24/26mg BID, target 97/103mg BID
    • Enalapril: Start 2.5mg BID, target 10-20mg BID
    • Carvedilol: Start 3.125mg BID, target 25mg BID (<85 kg) or 50mg BID (≥85 kg)
    • Metoprolol succinate: Start 12.5-25mg daily, target 200mg daily
    • Bisoprolol: Start 1.25mg daily, target 10mg daily 2

Common Pitfalls and Caveats

  1. Risk-treatment mismatch: Higher-risk patients often receive lower rates of evidence-based therapies despite potentially greater benefit 5

  2. Contraindications to consider:

    • ACE inhibitors/ARBs: Renal impairment, hyperkalemia
    • Beta-blockers: Severe bradycardia, hypotension, decompensated HF
    • MRAs: Severe renal dysfunction (creatinine >2.5 mg/dL in men, >2.0 mg/dL in women), hyperkalemia (K+ >5.0 mEq/L) 1
  3. Monitoring requirements:

    • Regular assessment of renal function and electrolytes, especially after initiation and dose adjustments
    • Blood pressure monitoring for hypotension, particularly with ARNI therapy 2
  4. Medication adherence: Less than 1% of patients receive all life-prolonging treatments at trial-proven doses; target achieving ≥80% of target doses for optimal outcomes 2

By implementing these evidence-based therapies, clinicians can significantly reduce mortality and morbidity in patients with symptomatic heart failure and EF 35-40%.

Related Questions

How to classify and manage heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and hyponatremia in a patient with a history of myocardial infarction, diabetes mellitus (DM) type 2, dyslipidemia, and impaired renal function?
What is the best course of treatment for a 29-year-old patient with a reduced Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) of 45%, bifascicular block, extreme axis deviation, pulmonary hypertension, and a chronic cough?
What is the recommended initial diagnostic step for a patient with debilitating heart failure and low ejection fraction?
What medication should be given to a 56-year-old patient with congestive heart failure (CHF) and an ejection fraction (EF) of 25%, who is asymptomatic and not currently on medication?
What is the recommended management and follow-up for a patient with a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of 55-60%, mild mitral regurgitation, mild to moderate tricuspid regurgitation, mild aortic regurgitation, and moderate left atrial dilation?
What type of heart failure and AHA stage and NYHA class is a patient with an EF of 35%?
What is the best natural vegan source of omega 3 (Eicosapentaenoic acid) fatty acids?
What is the management approach for a patient with diabetes and anemia?
What is the first-line treatment for Congestive Heart Failure (CHF)?
What changes would you make to a patient's current heart failure (HF) regimen consisting of Amiodarone (anti-arrhythmic), Isosorbide dinitrate (nitrates), Metoprolol tartrate (beta-blocker), and Torsemide (loop diuretic)?
Why is methotrexate (MTX) given on a weekly basis?

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.