Treatment Differences Between Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) and Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL)
The treatment approaches for ALL and CLL differ fundamentally, with ALL requiring intensive multi-agent chemotherapy administered in distinct phases (induction, consolidation, maintenance), while CLL typically follows a "watch and wait" approach for asymptomatic patients and less intensive targeted therapies for those requiring treatment.
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) Treatment
Treatment Phases
ALL treatment follows a complex, intensive approach with distinct phases:
Induction Phase
- Goal: Achieve complete remission by clearing leukemic cells from bone marrow 1
- Regimens:
Consolidation/Intensification Phase
Maintenance Phase
CNS Prophylaxis (throughout treatment)
- Methods:
- Intrathecal chemotherapy (methotrexate, cytarabine, corticosteroids)
- High-dose systemic chemotherapy
- ± Cranial irradiation 1
- Methods:
Risk-Adapted Therapy
Treatment intensity is adjusted based on:
- Age (pediatric vs. AYA vs. adult)
- WBC count at diagnosis
- Immunophenotype (B vs. T cell)
- Cytogenetics (Ph+, hypodiploidy, etc.)
- Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) status 1, 2
Novel Targeted Approaches
- Ph+ ALL: TKIs (imatinib, dasatinib, ponatinib) + chemotherapy or blinatumomab 1
- CD19+ B-ALL: Blinatumomab, CAR-T cell therapy 1, 2, 3
- CD22+ B-ALL: Inotuzumab ozogamicin 2, 3
Role of Stem Cell Transplantation
- Considered for high-risk features:
- Ph+ ALL
- Persistent MRD ≥0.01% post-consolidation
- Induction failure
- Relapsed disease 1
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) Treatment
Treatment Approach
- Initial Management: "Watch and wait" for asymptomatic patients
- Treatment Indications:
- Progressive cytopenias
- Symptomatic or massive lymphadenopathy/splenomegaly
- Disease-related symptoms (fatigue, night sweats, weight loss)
- Rapidly increasing lymphocyte count
First-Line Treatment Options
Standard Risk CLL:
- BTK inhibitors (ibrutinib, acalabrutinib, zanubrutinib)
- Venetoclax + obinutuzumab
- For older/comorbid patients: Obinutuzumab + chlorambucil
High-Risk CLL (del17p/TP53 mutation):
- BTK inhibitors preferred
- Venetoclax + obinutuzumab
Relapsed/Refractory CLL
- Switch to alternative targeted therapy:
- BTK inhibitor if previously on venetoclax
- Venetoclax if previously on BTK inhibitor
- PI3K inhibitors (idelalisib, duvelisib)
Key Differences from ALL
- No distinct treatment phases (induction, consolidation, maintenance)
- Less intensive therapy with targeted agents rather than multi-agent chemotherapy
- Continuous treatment or fixed-duration approaches rather than 2-3 year protocols
- No routine CNS prophylaxis needed
- Stem cell transplantation rarely used in first remission
Practical Treatment Algorithm
Diagnosis Confirmation
- ALL: >20% lymphoblasts in bone marrow 2
- CLL: ≥5,000 B-lymphocytes/μL with characteristic immunophenotype
Risk Stratification
- ALL: Age, WBC count, immunophenotype, cytogenetics, MRD 1
- CLL: FISH analysis (del17p, del11q), IGHV mutation status, TP53 mutation
Treatment Selection
- ALL: Multi-agent chemotherapy by phase with risk-adapted intensity
- CLL: Observe or targeted therapy based on symptoms and risk factors
Response Assessment
Post-Remission Decisions
- ALL: Consider transplant for high-risk features 1
- CLL: Continue therapy or observe based on response and treatment type
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
For ALL:
- Inadequate CNS prophylaxis leading to CNS relapse
- Insufficient treatment intensity in adolescents and young adults
- Failure to incorporate TKIs early for Ph+ ALL
- Not monitoring MRD to guide treatment decisions
For CLL:
- Treating asymptomatic patients without indications
- Using intensive chemotherapy in elderly or comorbid patients
- Not testing for TP53/17p status before treatment selection
- Overlooking drug interactions with targeted agents