Treatment Options for Prostate Cancer
The treatment of prostate cancer should be risk-stratified based on disease characteristics, with active surveillance being the preferred management strategy for low-risk disease, while surgery or radiation therapy (with or without androgen deprivation therapy) is recommended for intermediate and high-risk disease. 1
Risk Stratification
Treatment decisions should be based on risk classification:
Low-Risk Disease
- Clinical stage T1-T2a
- Gleason score ≤6 (ISUP grade 1)
- PSA <10 ng/mL
Intermediate-Risk Disease
- Clinical stage T2b-T2c, or
- Gleason score 7, or
- PSA 10-20 ng/mL
High-Risk Disease
- Clinical stage T3a, or
- Gleason score 8-10, or
- PSA >20 ng/mL
Very High-Risk Disease
- Clinical stage T3b-T4 (locally advanced)
Treatment Options by Risk Category
Low-Risk Prostate Cancer
Active surveillance (preferred approach) 1, 2
- Regular monitoring with PSA testing every 3-6 months
- Digital rectal examination every 6-12 months
- Confirmatory biopsy within 6-12 months of diagnosis
- Subsequent biopsies every 1-2 years
- Intervention triggered by disease progression
Radical prostatectomy
- Consider for patients with life expectancy >10 years
- Associated with risks of erectile dysfunction (up to 80%) and urinary incontinence (up to 49%) 1
Radiation therapy options
- External beam radiation therapy (minimum 74 Gy)
- Brachytherapy (permanent seed implants or high-dose rate)
Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer
Radical prostatectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection (if risk of lymph node involvement ≥2%)
Radiation therapy
- External beam radiation with or without 4-6 months of ADT
- External beam radiation plus brachytherapy boost
- Brachytherapy alone (for favorable intermediate-risk)
Active surveillance is not generally recommended for patients with life expectancy >10 years 1
High-Risk Prostate Cancer
External beam radiation therapy plus 2-3 years of ADT (preferred, category 1) 1
External beam radiation plus brachytherapy boost (with or without ADT)
Radical prostatectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection (for selected patients) 1
Very High-Risk/Locally Advanced Disease
External beam radiation plus long-term ADT (category 1) 1
External beam radiation plus brachytherapy (with or without long-term ADT)
Radical prostatectomy plus pelvic lymph node dissection (for selected patients without fixation to adjacent organs)
Metastatic Disease
ADT plus additional systemic therapy:
Radiation therapy to the primary tumor (for low-volume metastatic disease) 1
Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (CRPC)
For patients who progress despite ADT:
First-line options:
- Abiraterone plus prednisone
- Enzalutamide
- Docetaxel chemotherapy
Second-line or post-docetaxel options:
- Abiraterone (if not used first-line)
- Enzalutamide (if not used first-line)
- Cabazitaxel
- Radium-223 (for bone-predominant disease)
Important Considerations
Active Surveillance
- Preserves quality of life by avoiding treatment side effects
- Excellent cancer-specific survival rates (>99% at 8 years) 1
- Requires patient commitment to follow-up protocol
- Consider intervention if: Gleason grade progression, increase in positive cores, PSA doubling time <3 years, or clinical progression 2
Surgery vs. Radiation
- Similar oncologic outcomes for localized disease
- Different side effect profiles:
- Surgery: Higher risk of urinary incontinence and erectile dysfunction
- Radiation: Higher risk of bowel dysfunction, delayed erectile dysfunction
Androgen Deprivation Therapy (ADT)
- Not recommended as primary monotherapy for localized disease 1
- Essential component of treatment for high-risk and metastatic disease
- Associated with significant side effects: hot flashes, sexual dysfunction, osteoporosis, metabolic syndrome
- Regular exercise reduces fatigue and improves quality of life for men on ADT 1
Emerging Approaches
- Novel imaging techniques (PSMA-PET) may improve staging but should not alter standard treatment approaches without evidence of benefit 1
- Cryotherapy, HIFU, and focal therapy are not recommended as standard initial treatments 1
By following this risk-stratified approach to prostate cancer management, clinicians can optimize outcomes while minimizing unnecessary treatment-related morbidity.