What is the typical workup for a patient with acute onset of hematuria?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: September 28, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Workup for Acute Onset of Hematuria

The typical workup for a patient with acute onset of hematuria should include a thorough history and physical examination, urinalysis with microscopic confirmation, urine culture, serum creatinine measurement, risk stratification, and appropriate imaging and cystoscopy based on risk factors. 1, 2

Initial Evaluation

History and Physical Examination

  • Obtain detailed history focusing on:
    • Age and sex (men ≥60 years and women ≥60 years are at higher risk) 1
    • Smoking history (pack-years categorized as <10-30, or >30) 1
    • History of gross hematuria
    • Family history of urologic malignancies
    • Occupational/environmental exposures
    • Medication use (especially anticoagulants)
    • Symptoms (dysuria, frequency, flank pain)
  • Physical examination should include:
    • Blood pressure measurement
    • Abdominal examination
    • Genitourinary examination

Laboratory Testing

  • Urinalysis with microscopic examination
    • Confirm hematuria with ≥3 RBC/HPF on 2 of 3 properly collected specimens 2
    • Assess for dysmorphic RBCs (suggesting glomerular source)
    • Check for proteinuria, pyuria, and casts
  • Serum creatinine to assess renal function 1
  • Urine culture to rule out infection 2

Risk Stratification

The AUA/SUFU 2025 guidelines recommend stratifying patients into three risk categories 1:

  1. Low/Negligible Risk (0%-0.4% risk of malignancy)

    • 3-10 RBC/HPF
    • Women <60 years or men <40 years
    • Never smoker or <10 pack-years
  2. Intermediate Risk (0.2%-3.1% risk of malignancy)

    • 11-25 RBC/HPF, OR
    • Women ≥60 years or men 40-59 years, OR
    • 10-30 pack-years smoking history
  3. High Risk (1.3%-6.3% risk of malignancy)

    • 25 RBC/HPF, OR

    • Men ≥60 years, OR
    • 30 pack-years smoking history

Imaging and Further Evaluation

Based on Risk Category:

  • Low/Negligible Risk:

    • Consider renal ultrasound 2
    • Follow-up urinalysis in 6-12 months
  • Intermediate Risk:

    • CT urography (92% sensitivity, 93% specificity for urologic abnormalities) 2
    • Cystoscopy
    • Consider urine cytology
  • High Risk:

    • CT urography
    • Cystoscopy
    • Urine cytology

Special Considerations:

  • For patients with renal insufficiency or contrast allergy, consider MR urography or ultrasound 2
  • Young patients may start with renal ultrasound (50% sensitivity, 95% specificity) 2
  • Patients with gross hematuria should undergo complete evaluation regardless of other risk factors due to >10% risk of malignancy 3

Follow-up Management

  • If initial evaluation is negative but hematuria persists:

    • Annual urinalysis for persistent asymptomatic microhematuria
    • If two consecutive negative annual urinalyses, no further evaluation needed
    • Consider repeat evaluation within 3-5 years for persistent/recurrent hematuria 2
  • Nephrology referral indicated for:

    • Proteinuria >1,000 mg/24 hours
    • Evidence of glomerular disease (dysmorphic RBCs, RBC casts)
    • Declining renal function 2

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  1. Underestimating microscopic hematuria: Even microscopic hematuria can indicate serious underlying pathology and should not be dismissed without appropriate evaluation 2

  2. Relying solely on imaging: Most cancers diagnosed in patients with hematuria are bladder cancers, optimally detected with cystoscopy, not just imaging 1

  3. Incomplete risk stratification: Failing to consider all risk factors (age, smoking history, degree of hematuria) can lead to inadequate evaluation 1

  4. Delayed evaluation: Delays in diagnosis of bladder cancer can contribute to a 34% increased risk of cancer-specific mortality 1

  5. Stopping at benign findings: Even if a benign cause is identified (e.g., UTI), persistent hematuria after treatment warrants complete evaluation 2

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Hematuria Evaluation

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Hematuria.

Primary care, 2019

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.