What are the diagnostic criteria for sepsis-induced cardiomyopathy?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: September 29, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Diagnosis of Sepsis-Induced Cardiomyopathy

Bedside cardiac ultrasonography (BCU) is the gold standard for diagnosing sepsis-induced cardiomyopathy, which should be performed in all patients with sepsis to evaluate for signs of left and right ventricular dysfunction. 1

Definition and Clinical Context

Sepsis-induced cardiomyopathy (SIC) refers to cardiac dysfunction that occurs in the setting of sepsis, characterized by:

  • Reversible myocardial dysfunction
  • Systolic and/or diastolic left ventricular dysfunction
  • Possible right ventricular dysfunction
  • Absence of primary cardiac ischemia

This condition affects approximately 10-70% of sepsis patients, with significant implications for mortality and morbidity 2.

Diagnostic Approach

Primary Diagnostic Tool: Echocardiography

  1. Timing of Echocardiography:

    • Perform BCU within 48 hours of sepsis diagnosis or at the time of initial catecholamine peak 3
    • Repeat echocardiography at 48-96 hours to assess for improvement, as SIC is typically reversible 3
  2. Key Echocardiographic Findings:

    • Left Ventricular Assessment:

      • Decreased left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF <50%) 1, 4
      • Systolic dysfunction (present in 50-60% of sepsis patients) 2
      • Diastolic dysfunction (early biomarker with prognostic significance) 2
      • Global longitudinal strain (GLS) abnormalities (more sensitive than LVEF) 4
    • Right Ventricular Assessment:

      • Right ventricular dysfunction (present in 50-55% of cases) 2
      • Isolated right ventricular dysfunction (present in 47% of cases) 2
      • RV:LV end-diastolic volume ratio changes 1
  3. Views and Techniques:

    • Apical four-chamber view
    • Subcostal short-axis view (particularly for RV assessment) 1
    • Parasternal long-axis and short-axis views

Advanced Imaging (When Available)

  • Cardiac MRI: Provides tissue characterization showing:
    • Increased T1 and T2 times in patients with impaired LVEF 3
    • Elevated extracellular volume values 3
    • Note: While sensitive, MRI has limited accessibility in ICU settings 2

Biomarkers

While not diagnostic on their own, these can support the diagnosis:

  • Cardiac troponins (elevated in myocardial injury)
  • B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) or NT-proBNP (elevated in cardiac stress) 1
  • Novel biomarkers under investigation:
    • Fibroblast growth factor-21 (FGF-21)
    • Growth differentiation factor-15 (GDF-15) 2

Diagnostic Algorithm

  1. Initial Assessment:

    • Identify patients with sepsis according to current definitions
    • Look for clinical signs of cardiac dysfunction (hypotension, tachycardia, new murmurs)
  2. First-line Diagnostic Test:

    • Perform bedside cardiac ultrasonography (BCU) 1
    • Measure LVEF, RV function, and when possible, global longitudinal strain
  3. Diagnostic Criteria:

    • Definite SIC: Decreased LVEF (<50%) in a patient with sepsis without prior cardiac dysfunction 4
    • Probable SIC: Normal LVEF but impaired GLS in a septic patient 4
    • RV-predominant SIC: Normal LVEF but evidence of RV dysfunction 2
  4. Follow-up Assessment:

    • Repeat echocardiography at 48-96 hours to document improvement 3
    • Monitor cardiac biomarkers (troponin, BNP/NT-proBNP)

Clinical Implications and Pitfalls

Prognostic Significance

  • SIC is associated with increased 90-day mortality (67% vs. 29% in patients without SIC) 5
  • Patients with SIC have 6.1 times higher odds of mortality at 90 days 5

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  1. Relying solely on LVEF: LVEF is load-dependent and may not accurately reflect intrinsic myocardial contractility in sepsis due to altered loading conditions 4

  2. Missing diastolic dysfunction: Diastolic dysfunction can be present even with preserved LVEF 2

  3. Overlooking right ventricular involvement: RV dysfunction is common and associated with worse prognosis 2

  4. Single assessment: SIC is dynamic; repeated evaluations are essential to capture its evolution 4

  5. Confusing with other cardiomyopathies: Takotsubo cardiomyopathy can present similarly and may coexist with SIC 1, 3

By following this diagnostic approach, clinicians can promptly identify sepsis-induced cardiomyopathy and initiate appropriate management strategies to improve outcomes in this high-risk patient population.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Septic Cardiomyopathy.

Reviews in cardiovascular medicine, 2024

Research

Septic cardiomyopathy: Diagnosis and management.

Journal of intensive medicine, 2022

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.