Diagnostic Approach for Suspected Pulmonary Embolism
Plasma D-dimer should be ordered as the initial test to help rule out pulmonary embolism in this patient with intermediate pretest probability. 1, 2
Assessment of Pretest Probability
This 64-year-old man presents with acute dyspnea and has several clinical features that require evaluation for possible pulmonary embolism (PE):
- Age 64 years
- Acute dyspnea for the past hour
- History of coronary artery bypass graft surgery 5 years ago
- Tachycardia (heart rate 95 bpm)
- Tachypnea (respiratory rate 22)
- Hypertension (BP 142/96)
Using validated clinical prediction rules as recommended by the American College of Physicians 1, this patient would be classified as having an intermediate pretest probability for PE based on:
- Age > 50 years
- Recent onset of symptoms
- Tachycardia (nearly 100 bpm)
- Tachypnea
The patient does not meet PERC (Pulmonary Embolism Rule-Out Criteria) due to his age >50 years and elevated heart rate, so further testing is required 2.
Diagnostic Algorithm
For patients with intermediate pretest probability of PE, the diagnostic approach should follow these steps:
If D-dimer is positive (above age-adjusted cutoff):
Why D-dimer First?
The American College of Physicians explicitly recommends against using imaging studies as the initial test in patients with low or intermediate pretest probability 1. Starting with D-dimer in intermediate-risk patients:
- Avoids unnecessary radiation exposure if negative
- Is cost-effective
- Has high sensitivity (>95%) for ruling out PE when negative
- Follows evidence-based guidelines 1, 2
Important Considerations
- Age-adjusted D-dimer thresholds (age × 10 ng/mL) should be used for patients >50 years to improve specificity without sacrificing sensitivity 1, 2
- If D-dimer is positive, CTPA is the recommended imaging modality for definitive diagnosis 1, 3, 4
- Ventilation-perfusion (V/Q) scanning should be reserved for patients with contraindications to CTPA (such as renal insufficiency or contrast allergy) 1, 5
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
- Proceeding directly to imaging without D-dimer testing in intermediate-risk patients increases radiation exposure and costs 1, 2
- Using non-age-adjusted D-dimer cutoffs in older patients reduces specificity and leads to unnecessary imaging 1, 2
- Ordering D-dimer in high-probability patients (not applicable to this case) can lead to false negatives 2
By following this evidence-based approach, you can efficiently and safely evaluate this patient for possible pulmonary embolism while minimizing unnecessary testing and radiation exposure.