What inotropes and vasopressors are used to manage cardiogenic shock?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 2, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Management of Inotropes and Vasopressors in Cardiogenic Shock

In cardiogenic shock, norepinephrine should be used as the first-line vasopressor, and dobutamine as the first-line inotrope, with combination therapy often required to maintain adequate tissue perfusion. 1

Initial Assessment and Hemodynamic Targets

When managing cardiogenic shock, aim for these specific hemodynamic targets:

  • Cardiac index ≥2.2 L/min/m²
  • Mixed venous oxygen saturation ≥70%
  • Mean arterial pressure ≥70 mmHg
  • Urine output >30 mL/h
  • Lactate clearance 1

Pulmonary artery catheter monitoring can be useful for management of patients with cardiogenic shock (Class IIa, Level of Evidence: C) 2.

First-Line Agents

Vasopressors

  • Norepinephrine: First-line vasopressor for cardiogenic shock
    • Mechanism: Alpha-adrenergic vasoconstriction with some beta-adrenergic effects 3
    • Dosing: Start at 8-12 μg/min and adjust according to response 1
    • Benefits: Increases blood pressure with minimal tachycardia, decreases preload dependency 2

Inotropes

  • Dobutamine: First-line inotropic agent for cardiogenic shock
    • Mechanism: Direct-acting inotropic agent primarily stimulating β-receptors 4
    • Dosing: 2-20 μg/kg/min IV 2, 1
    • Benefits: Increases cardiac output without marked increases in heart rate, improves stroke volume 4
    • Caution: May cause arrhythmias (62.9% vs 32.8% with milrinone) 5

Second-Line and Combination Therapy

When First-Line Agents Are Insufficient:

  • Combination therapy: Dobutamine + norepinephrine for persistent hypotension despite isolated inotropic support 1

  • Milrinone: Consider as a second-line inotrope

    • Mechanism: Phosphodiesterase inhibitor with inotropic and vasodilator properties 6
    • Dosing: Requires dilution prior to administration 6
    • Benefits: Fewer arrhythmias than dobutamine (32.8% vs 62.9%) 5
    • Caution: More likely to cause hypotension (49.2% vs 40.3% with dobutamine) 5
  • Levosimendan: Consider especially in patients on chronic beta-blockers

    • Dosing: 0.05-0.2 μg/kg/min for 24 hours 1
    • Benefits: Increases contractility and cardiac output with minimal tachycardia and without increasing myocardial oxygen consumption 2
    • Caution: Often causes significant decrease in MAP, especially with loading dose 2
  • Vasopressin: Consider for tachycardic patients or those with pulmonary hypertension 7

    • Caution: May impair cardiac contractility via V1a receptor-mediated decreased β-adrenergic receptor sensitivity 2

Algorithmic Approach to Cardiogenic Shock

  1. Initial stabilization:

    • Start norepinephrine if SBP <70-100 mmHg (5-15 μg/kg/min) 2
    • Add dobutamine 2-20 μg/kg/min if cardiac output remains inadequate 2, 1
  2. If inadequate response:

    • Escalate dobutamine up to 20 μg/kg/min
    • Consider adding or switching to milrinone if arrhythmias develop
    • Consider levosimendan in patients on chronic beta-blockers
  3. Refractory shock:

    • Consider mechanical circulatory support
    • Intra-aortic balloon pump may be reasonable for refractory pulmonary congestion (Class IIb) 2

Important Considerations and Pitfalls

  • Avoid beta-blockers or calcium channel blockers in patients with frank cardiac failure (Class III, Level of Evidence: B) 2

  • Avoid aggressive simultaneous use of agents that cause hypotension, which can initiate a cycle of hypoperfusion-ischemia 2

  • Monitor for common adverse effects:

    • Dobutamine: Arrhythmias (more common than with milrinone) 5
    • Milrinone: Hypotension (more common than with dobutamine) 5
  • Consider early transfer to a tertiary care center with 24/7 cardiac catheterization and ICU capabilities for advanced management options 1

  • Evidence limitations: Recent studies show no significant difference between milrinone and dobutamine in terms of mortality or composite outcomes in cardiogenic shock 8, suggesting that the choice between these agents may depend more on their adverse effect profiles than on efficacy differences.

References

Guideline

Shock Management

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

The medical treatment of cardiogenic shock: cardiovascular drugs.

Current opinion in critical care, 2021

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.