Where is continuous subcutaneous hydrocortisone infusion (CSHI) available for Addison's disease treatment?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 2, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Availability and Adoption Challenges of Continuous Subcutaneous Hydrocortisone Infusion (CSHI) for Addison's Disease

Continuous subcutaneous hydrocortisone infusion (CSHI) is currently available primarily in specialized endocrinology centers as an investigational treatment modality, with limited widespread adoption due to technical complexity, cost barriers, and lack of regulatory approval in most countries.

Current Availability Status

  • CSHI is primarily available in research settings and specialized endocrinology centers, particularly in Norway and Sweden where most clinical trials have been conducted 1, 2
  • Unlike conventional oral hydrocortisone therapy, which is widely available and established as standard care, CSHI remains an emerging therapy with limited accessibility 3
  • CSHI is not yet approved by major regulatory agencies for routine clinical use in most countries, limiting its availability to research protocols or specialized centers

Clinical Benefits Driving Interest

CSHI offers several advantages that make it an attractive option for specific patient populations:

  • Provides a more physiological circadian cortisol rhythm compared to conventional oral therapy 1
  • Establishes normalized ACTH levels and prevents continuous overnight glucose decreases 2
  • May be particularly beneficial for patients with poor biochemical control on conventional therapy 4
  • Allows for dose reduction in many patients without adverse effects 1

Major Adoption Challenges

Technical and Practical Barriers

  • Requires specialized pump technology similar to insulin pumps used in diabetes management
  • Demands higher level of patient education and technical competence
  • Necessitates regular maintenance of infusion sites and equipment
  • Lacks standardized protocols for dose adjustment and monitoring

Economic and Regulatory Hurdles

  • Higher cost compared to conventional oral therapy (hydrocortisone tablets)
  • Limited reimbursement from insurance providers due to investigational status
  • Absence of regulatory approval in most countries restricts marketing and distribution
  • Need for specialized healthcare provider training and support systems

Clinical Implementation Challenges

  • Limited long-term safety and efficacy data compared to conventional therapy 3
  • Lack of established guidelines for patient selection and management
  • Need for more robust comparative studies with conventional therapy
  • Concerns about infusion site reactions and technical failures

Patient Selection Considerations

CSHI may be particularly beneficial for:

  • Patients with poor quality of life despite conventional therapy
  • Those with significant fluctuations in cortisol levels on oral therapy
  • Patients requiring high doses of oral glucocorticoids with associated side effects
  • Individuals with persistent abnormal ACTH levels despite conventional treatment 4

Future Directions

  • Development of modified-release hydrocortisone tablets as an alternative to achieve circadian rhythm without pump technology 5, 3
  • Need for larger multicenter trials to establish long-term safety and efficacy
  • Development of standardized protocols and guidelines for CSHI implementation
  • Advocacy for regulatory approval and insurance coverage to improve accessibility

Perioperative Considerations

While not directly related to outpatient CSHI availability, it's worth noting that intravenous hydrocortisone infusion is recommended during surgical procedures for patients with adrenal insufficiency:

  • Hydrocortisone 100 mg IV at induction followed by continuous infusion at 200 mg/24h is the preferred regimen for surgical patients 6
  • This approach is considered safer than intermittent bolus dosing during the perioperative period 6

In conclusion, while CSHI shows promise as a physiological replacement therapy for Addison's disease, its widespread adoption faces significant technical, economic, and regulatory challenges that currently limit its availability to specialized centers and research settings.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.