What percentage of healthy adolescents have a right bundle branch block (RBBB) pattern on electrocardiogram (ECG) with no underlying cardiac pathology?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 2, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Prevalence of RBBB in Healthy Adolescents

In healthy adolescents, complete right bundle branch block (RBBB) is found in approximately 1.6% of the population with no underlying cardiac pathology, while incomplete RBBB is more common and considered a normal variant in children and adolescents. 1

Complete vs. Incomplete RBBB in Adolescents

Complete RBBB

  • Defined by QRS duration >100 ms in children ages 4-16 years 2
  • Characterized by:
    • rSR', rsR, or rSR pattern in leads V1 or V2
    • S wave of greater duration than R wave or >40 ms in leads I and V6
    • Normal R peak time in V5 and V6 but >50 ms in lead V1 2
  • Complete RBBB was the most common major ECG abnormality (1.6%) in a large study of adolescents 1
  • Associated with height irrespective of age, sex, and BMI
  • More frequent in students regularly practicing physical activity (1.80% vs. 1.02%) 1

Incomplete RBBB

  • Defined by QRS duration between 90-100 ms in children 4-16 years 2
  • In children, may be diagnosed when terminal rightward deflection is <40 ms but ≥20 ms 2
  • Higher prevalence in underweight adolescents (21.58% vs. 15.10% in non-underweight students) 1
  • Considered a normal variant in children, particularly when:
    • Lead V1 is recorded higher than or to the right of normal position
    • r is less than 20 ms 2
  • An rSR' pattern in V1 and V2 with normal QRS duration is explicitly recognized as a normal variant in children 2

Clinical Significance and Evaluation

  • The 2017 International Recommendations for ECG Interpretation in Athletes classifies complete RBBB as a "borderline" ECG finding that in isolation likely does not represent pathologic cardiovascular disease 2
  • However, the presence of two or more borderline findings may warrant additional investigation 2
  • A 2024 study found that CRBBB-related cardiac conditions were identified in only 5% of young individuals (14-35 years) with CRBBB 3
  • Pathology was more frequently identified in individuals with:
    • Non-isolated CRBBB (14% vs. 1% for isolated CRBBB)
    • QRS duration ≥130 ms (10% vs. 1% for QRS <130 ms) 3

Practical Implications

  • High inter-reader variability exists in the identification of incomplete RBBB, with prevalence ranging from 1-20% among different readers 4
  • Despite increased use of echocardiography in patients with IRBBB, it was not associated with increased rate of echocardiographic findings compared to normal ECGs 4
  • In young individuals, CRBBB is more prevalent in males and athletes (0.20% vs. 0.06% in females; 0.25% vs. 0.14% in non-athletes) 3

Conclusion

The prevalence of complete RBBB in healthy adolescents is approximately 1.6%, while incomplete RBBB is more common and considered a normal variant. The presence of isolated RBBB in adolescents rarely indicates underlying cardiac pathology, especially when QRS duration is <130 ms and no other ECG abnormalities are present.

References

Research

Electrocardiographic characteristics, anthropometric features, and cardiovascular risk factors in a large cohort of adolescents.

Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology, 2018

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.