At what age is an ultrasound versus X-ray (x-ray) preferred for diagnosing hip abnormalities in infants?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 3, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Ultrasound vs. X-ray for Hip Imaging in Infants

Ultrasound is the preferred imaging modality for infants younger than 4 months of age, while X-ray is recommended for infants 4 months and older when evaluating for developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). 1

Age-Based Imaging Recommendations

Under 4 Months of Age

  • Ultrasound is the imaging modality of choice for infants younger than 4 months 1, 2
  • Ultrasound allows visualization of the cartilaginous components of the hip that are not visible on radiographs in young infants 2
  • Earliest recommended timing for ultrasound screening is 2 weeks of age, as hip instability often resolves spontaneously by this time 1
  • The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends selective ultrasound screening at 4-6 weeks of age for high-risk infants 1

4 Months and Older

  • Radiographic evaluation (X-ray) becomes the preferred method at 4 months of age 1
  • By 6 weeks of age, radiographic changes in the acetabulum and lateral displacement of the femoral neck and metaphysis can be recognized, but radiographs become more reliable at 4 months 1
  • A radiographic screening program can be successfully implemented for infants at 4 months of age who were clinically normal at neonatal examination but are considered at risk for DDH 1

Rationale for Age-Based Approach

  • Ultrasound in young infants:

    • Allows visualization of cartilaginous structures not yet ossified 2
    • Permits dynamic assessment of hip stability 1
    • Can detect subtle abnormalities earlier than radiographs 1
  • X-ray in older infants:

    • By 4 months, sufficient ossification has occurred to make radiographic evaluation reliable 1
    • The ossific nucleus of the femoral head begins to appear, making radiographic assessment more accurate 1
    • Provides standardized measurements such as the acetabular index 1

Special Considerations

  • High-risk infants (breech presentation, family history of DDH) should receive imaging regardless of normal physical examination findings 1, 3
  • Ultrasound has high sensitivity but can lead to overdiagnosis and overtreatment if performed too early (before 2 weeks of age) 1
  • Some recent evidence suggests ultrasound may be a feasible alternative to X-ray even at 6 months of age, though this is not yet standard practice 4
  • Early detection and treatment of DDH is crucial for preventing long-term morbidity and improving quality of life 5

Monitoring During Treatment

  • For infants undergoing treatment with abduction devices (e.g., Pavlik harness), serial imaging is recommended to monitor progress 1, 6
  • Follow-up ultrasound at 3-4 weeks after treatment initiation shows better outcomes compared to 6-week follow-up in terms of treatment duration 6
  • After successful treatment, transition to radiographic monitoring typically occurs at 4-6 months of age 1

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Ultrasound Is an Alternative to X-ray for Diagnosing Developmental Dysplasia of the Hips in 6-Month-Old Children.

HSS journal : the musculoskeletal journal of Hospital for Special Surgery, 2019

Research

Length of treatment and ultrasound timing in infants with developmental dysplasia of the hip.

European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie, 2024

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.