What is the role of a bite block (mandibular advancement device) in treating obstructive sleep apnea (OSA)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 4, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Role of Mandibular Advancement Devices in Treating Obstructive Sleep Apnea

Mandibular advancement devices (MADs) are recommended as first-line therapy for patients with mild to moderate obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and as an alternative therapy for patients with severe OSA who are intolerant to or refuse CPAP therapy. 1

Effectiveness of MADs in OSA

  • MADs reduce the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI), arousal index, and daytime sleepiness while improving quality of life measures in adult patients with OSA 1
  • Treatment success rates (defined as ≥50% reduction in AHI) with MADs are approximately 52% overall, with higher success rates in moderate (52%) and severe (63%) OSA compared to mild OSA (25%) 2
  • Complete resolution of OSA (AHI reduced to <5/hr) occurs in approximately 40% of patients using MADs 3
  • Although CPAP is superior to MADs in normalizing respiratory parameters (AHI, oxygen desaturation index, and minimal oxygen saturation), both treatments demonstrate comparable effects on symptoms and health-related quality of life measures 1, 4
  • Long-term effectiveness has been demonstrated, with over 50% of patients maintaining treatment success after 5 years of MAD use 2

Patient Selection Criteria

  • Ideal candidates for MAD therapy include:

    • Patients with mild to moderate OSA with no comorbidities 1
    • Patients with severe OSA who are intolerant to CPAP or request an alternative therapy 1
    • Patients with primary snoring (without OSA) 1
  • Factors associated with better treatment success:

    • Younger age and female gender 1, 3
    • Lower BMI and smaller neck circumference 1, 3
    • Position-dependent OSA (supine-predominant) 1
    • Lower baseline AHI 1
    • No previous CPAP use 2

Device Characteristics and Implementation

  • An effective MAD should be:

    • Individualized and titratable 1
    • Made of biocompatible materials 1
    • Engaging both maxillary and mandibular arches 1
    • Stable and retentive to teeth, implants, or edentulous ridge 1
    • Capable of advancing the mandible in increments of 1mm or less 1
    • Adjustable with a protrusive range of at least 5mm 1
    • Reversible in advancement if needed 1
  • Recommended protocol:

    • Initial titration should start at approximately 50% of maximum mandibular advancement 1, 4
    • Custom-made devices are more effective than prefabricated ones 1
    • Follow-up sleep testing is essential to verify treatment efficacy 1

Adherence and Patient Preference

  • Adherence with MADs is typically better than with CPAP in OSA patients 1
  • Long-term adherence data shows 93.3% of patients use their MAD ≥4 hours/night on ≥4 days/week after 5 years 2
  • Patient satisfaction is high, with 96.5% of patients wanting to continue MAD therapy after 5 years 2

Potential Side Effects and Monitoring

  • Initial side effects are common but generally minor and transient:

    • Jaw discomfort, tooth tenderness, excessive salivation 1
    • Temporary occlusal changes 1
  • Long-term dental changes may occur but are typically subclinical for most patients 3

  • Regular follow-up is recommended to monitor treatment efficacy and potential side effects 1, 4

Clinical Pitfalls and Considerations

  • MADs are less effective than CPAP in reducing AHI, but similar effectiveness in clinical practice may result from better compliance with MADs 3
  • Not all patients will respond to MAD therapy despite improvement in symptoms 3
  • A multidisciplinary approach involving sleep physicians and qualified dentists is essential for optimal patient outcomes 1
  • Re-evaluation with sleep testing is necessary after MAD titration, as improvement in symptoms alone is an imprecise indicator of treatment success 1

Treatment Algorithm

  1. Diagnose OSA severity through polysomnography or home sleep apnea testing
  2. For mild to moderate OSA: Consider MAD as first-line therapy
  3. For severe OSA: Recommend CPAP as first-line therapy; offer MAD if CPAP is refused or not tolerated
  4. Refer to a qualified dentist for oral examination and MAD fitting
  5. Begin with 50% of maximum mandibular advancement and titrate as needed
  6. Conduct follow-up sleep testing to verify treatment efficacy
  7. Schedule regular follow-ups to monitor side effects and treatment response

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Mandibular advancement device use in obstructive sleep apnea: ORCADES study 5-year follow-up data.

Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine, 2021

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.