Role of Mandibular Advancement Devices in Treating Obstructive Sleep Apnea
Mandibular advancement devices (MADs) are recommended as first-line therapy for patients with mild to moderate obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and as an alternative therapy for patients with severe OSA who are intolerant to or refuse CPAP therapy. 1
Effectiveness of MADs in OSA
- MADs reduce the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI), arousal index, and daytime sleepiness while improving quality of life measures in adult patients with OSA 1
- Treatment success rates (defined as ≥50% reduction in AHI) with MADs are approximately 52% overall, with higher success rates in moderate (52%) and severe (63%) OSA compared to mild OSA (25%) 2
- Complete resolution of OSA (AHI reduced to <5/hr) occurs in approximately 40% of patients using MADs 3
- Although CPAP is superior to MADs in normalizing respiratory parameters (AHI, oxygen desaturation index, and minimal oxygen saturation), both treatments demonstrate comparable effects on symptoms and health-related quality of life measures 1, 4
- Long-term effectiveness has been demonstrated, with over 50% of patients maintaining treatment success after 5 years of MAD use 2
Patient Selection Criteria
Ideal candidates for MAD therapy include:
Factors associated with better treatment success:
Device Characteristics and Implementation
An effective MAD should be:
- Individualized and titratable 1
- Made of biocompatible materials 1
- Engaging both maxillary and mandibular arches 1
- Stable and retentive to teeth, implants, or edentulous ridge 1
- Capable of advancing the mandible in increments of 1mm or less 1
- Adjustable with a protrusive range of at least 5mm 1
- Reversible in advancement if needed 1
Recommended protocol:
Adherence and Patient Preference
- Adherence with MADs is typically better than with CPAP in OSA patients 1
- Long-term adherence data shows 93.3% of patients use their MAD ≥4 hours/night on ≥4 days/week after 5 years 2
- Patient satisfaction is high, with 96.5% of patients wanting to continue MAD therapy after 5 years 2
Potential Side Effects and Monitoring
Initial side effects are common but generally minor and transient:
Long-term dental changes may occur but are typically subclinical for most patients 3
Regular follow-up is recommended to monitor treatment efficacy and potential side effects 1, 4
Clinical Pitfalls and Considerations
- MADs are less effective than CPAP in reducing AHI, but similar effectiveness in clinical practice may result from better compliance with MADs 3
- Not all patients will respond to MAD therapy despite improvement in symptoms 3
- A multidisciplinary approach involving sleep physicians and qualified dentists is essential for optimal patient outcomes 1
- Re-evaluation with sleep testing is necessary after MAD titration, as improvement in symptoms alone is an imprecise indicator of treatment success 1
Treatment Algorithm
- Diagnose OSA severity through polysomnography or home sleep apnea testing
- For mild to moderate OSA: Consider MAD as first-line therapy
- For severe OSA: Recommend CPAP as first-line therapy; offer MAD if CPAP is refused or not tolerated
- Refer to a qualified dentist for oral examination and MAD fitting
- Begin with 50% of maximum mandibular advancement and titrate as needed
- Conduct follow-up sleep testing to verify treatment efficacy
- Schedule regular follow-ups to monitor side effects and treatment response