Diagnosis of Dengue Fever
Dengue fever is definitively diagnosed through laboratory testing, with the optimal method depending on the timing of presentation, using either viral detection methods within the first week of symptoms or serological testing thereafter.
Clinical Presentation and Initial Evaluation
- Dengue fever typically presents as an acute febrile illness characterized by frontal headache, retro-orbital pain, muscle and joint pain, and rash 1, 2
- The incubation period ranges from 3-14 days, with most cases developing symptoms 4-8 days after infection 1, 2
- Classic dengue fever should be suspected in patients with fever and travel history to endemic regions (tropical or subtropical areas where Aedes mosquitoes are present) 2
Laboratory Diagnostic Methods
Early Phase Testing (≤7 days after symptom onset)
Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests (NAATs) are the preferred diagnostic method during the first week of illness 1
NS1 Antigen Detection is an excellent alternative to NAAT in the acute phase 1, 5
Late Phase Testing (>7 days after symptom onset)
Serological Testing becomes more appropriate after the first week of illness 1, 3
- IgM antibody capture ELISA (MAC-ELISA) is the primary serological test 1
- IgM antibodies typically develop during the first week of illness and may remain detectable for 2-3 months 1, 2
- A positive IgM antibody test on a single acute (late) or convalescent-phase serum specimen supports a probable case diagnosis 1
Paired Serum Samples provide the most definitive serological diagnosis 1
Case Classification
Confirmed Case: A clinically compatible case that is laboratory confirmed through one of the following 1:
- Isolation of dengue virus from serum and/or autopsy tissue samples
- Demonstration of a fourfold or greater change in antibody titers in paired samples
- Detection of dengue virus antigen or viral nucleic acid
Probable Case: A clinically compatible case with supportive serologic findings (IgG antibody titer ≥1280 or positive IgM antibody test on a single specimen) 1
Diagnostic Challenges and Considerations
Cross-reactivity with other flaviviruses (e.g., Zika virus, West Nile virus) can complicate serological diagnosis 1, 6
- Plaque reduction neutralization tests (PRNTs) provide improved specificity but are only available at select public health laboratories 1
Combination testing using both viral detection (PCR or NS1) and serological methods provides the most comprehensive diagnostic approach 5, 3
Hematological monitoring is important for assessing disease severity 4