When is it appropriate to use a FRAX (Fracture Risk Assessment Tool) calculator in patients with osteoporosis?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 9, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

When to Use a FRAX Calculator

The FRAX calculator should be used in adults aged 40 to 90 years to estimate 10-year fracture risk, particularly when evaluating patients with low bone mineral density or risk factors for osteoporosis. 1, 2

Primary Indications for FRAX Calculator Use

  • FRAX is most appropriate for adults aged 40-90 years who have not yet received treatment for osteoporosis 2, 3
  • It should be used to calculate 10-year probability of hip fracture or major osteoporotic fracture in patients with risk factors for fracture 1, 4
  • FRAX is particularly valuable in patients with osteopenia (T-scores between -1.0 and -2.4) to determine if pharmacologic treatment is warranted 1, 2
  • For adults ≥40 years initiating glucocorticoid therapy, FRAX with glucocorticoid dose adjustment should be used within 6 months of starting treatment 1

Specific Clinical Scenarios

  • For postmenopausal women and men over 50 years with low bone mass but not osteoporosis (T-scores > -2.5), FRAX helps identify those who would benefit from treatment 1, 4
  • In patients on glucocorticoids, FRAX should be used with dose adjustment (increase major osteoporotic fracture risk by 1.15 and hip fracture risk by 1.2 if prednisone dose >7.5 mg/day) 1
  • For patients with obesity being evaluated for osteoporosis, FRAX can help reassess fracture risk and guide treatment decisions 5
  • FRAX should be used when DXA results alone may not capture full fracture risk, especially in younger populations 1

Reassessment Intervals

  • For adults ≥40 years on continued glucocorticoid treatment who are not on osteoporosis medication, FRAX reassessment should be completed every 1-3 years 1
  • Earlier reassessment within this timeframe is recommended for patients on very high-dose glucocorticoids (prednisone ≥30 mg/day or cumulative dose >5 gm in previous year) 1
  • For patients with history of osteoporotic fracture, reassessment should be performed more frequently 1

Treatment Thresholds Based on FRAX

  • According to National Osteoporosis Foundation guidelines, treatment is recommended for patients with FRAX 10-year risk scores of ≥3% for hip fracture or ≥20% for major osteoporotic fracture 1, 2
  • FRAX results should guide the decision to initiate bone mineral density testing and/or osteoporosis treatment 1, 6
  • In patients with low bone mass (T-scores between -1.0 and -2.4), FRAX helps identify the subset at higher fracture risk who would benefit from pharmacologic intervention 1, 2

Limitations and Considerations

  • FRAX is validated only for untreated patients and should not be used to monitor treatment response 2, 3
  • The calculator has limitations regarding race-specific calculations, which may lead to differences in treatment recommendations among persons with otherwise identical risk profiles 1
  • FRAX does not account for dose-dependent effects of risk factors like glucocorticoids and alcohol (only binary yes/no) 1
  • Fall risk is not included in the FRAX calculation but should be considered in clinical decision-making 2, 4
  • The predictive accuracy of FRAX improves when BMD is included in the risk assessment calculation 1

Integration with Other Assessment Tools

  • FRAX should be used alongside clinical fracture risk assessment, which includes evaluation of falls, fractures, frailty, and other risk factors 1
  • When available, including BMD measurements from DXA improves the accuracy of FRAX predictions 1
  • For patients <40 years of age, FRAX is not validated, and clinical risk assessment with BMD testing should be used instead 1

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.