What is the primary treatment for hydrocephalus?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 9, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Primary Treatment Options for Hydrocephalus

The primary treatments for hydrocephalus are cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) shunts and endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV), both of which demonstrate equivalent outcomes in clinical studies. 1

Surgical Management Options

CSF Shunts

  • Ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunts are the most common type of CSF shunt used for hydrocephalus treatment 1
  • CSF shunts work by diverting excess cerebrospinal fluid from the ventricles to another body cavity (typically the peritoneum) where it can be absorbed 1
  • Antibiotic-impregnated shunt tubing should be used to reduce the risk of shunt infection, particularly in children (Level I recommendation, high degree of clinical certainty) 1

Endoscopic Third Ventriculostomy (ETV)

  • ETV creates an alternative pathway for CSF flow by making an opening in the floor of the third ventricle 1
  • Advantages include lower failure rates and potential to avoid shunt placement and its inherent risks 1
  • May be combined with choroid plexus coagulation (CPC) in the treatment of infant hydrocephalus 1

Evidence-Based Recommendation

According to the Congress of Neurological Surgeons systematic review and evidence-based guidelines:

  • Both CSF shunts and ETV are options in the treatment of pediatric hydrocephalus (Level II recommendation, moderate clinical certainty) 1
  • The selection between these two procedures should be based on the etiology of hydrocephalus and patient-specific factors 1

Special Considerations

For Posthemorrhagic Hydrocephalus in Premature Infants

  • Temporary measures may be needed before definitive treatment:
    • Ventricular access devices (VADs), external ventricular drains (EVDs), ventriculosubgaleal (VSG) shunts, or lumbar punctures are treatment options (Level II recommendation) 1
    • VSG shunts reduce the need for daily CSF aspiration compared with VADs (Level II recommendation) 1
    • Routine use of serial lumbar puncture is not recommended to reduce shunt placement or avoid progression of hydrocephalus (Level I recommendation) 1

Technical Advancements

  • Neuronavigation for proximal catheter placement and laparoscopy for distal catheter placement can reduce shunt failure rates by up to 44% 2
  • Laparoscopic techniques facilitate rapid, safe, and direct placement of the peritoneal component of VP shunts 3

Complications and Pitfalls

  • Shunt failure rates can be alarmingly high, with up to 50% of patients requiring revision surgery within 2 years 2
  • Common complications include:
    • Infection
    • Catheter mispositioning
    • Catheter migration
    • Catheter occlusion 2
    • Subdural fluid collections (observed in approximately 18% of patients) 4

Follow-up Considerations

  • Regular follow-up is essential to monitor shunt function
  • Symptom recurrence may occur even after successful initial treatment (approximately 45.5% of patients may experience worsening symptoms at 1-year follow-up) 4
  • Standardized assessment of gait, balance, and cognition before and after temporary CSF diversion can help identify patients likely to benefit from VP shunt placement 4

Despite ongoing research into non-surgical approaches, surgical intervention remains the mainstay of hydrocephalus treatment, with the choice between CSF shunts and ETV being determined by patient-specific factors and the underlying etiology of hydrocephalus 5.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.