What is the absolute treatment for Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus (NPH)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: January 29, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Absolute Treatment for Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus (NPH)

Ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt placement is the definitive treatment for NPH, providing sustained clinical improvement for 5-7 years in appropriately selected patients. 1

Primary Treatment: VP Shunt

VP shunt remains the gold standard and most common treatment for NPH according to the American Academy of Neurology. 2 This procedure achieves:

  • Clinical improvement in 89.6% of patients at 6-week follow-up 3
  • Sustained benefit for 5-7 years in properly selected candidates 1
  • Most significant improvement in gait disturbance, followed by lesser improvements in cognition and incontinence 4

Patient Selection Criteria

Before proceeding with VP shunt, patients must demonstrate objective improvement after temporary CSF diversion testing:

  • Lumbar drain trial is mandatory to predict shunt responsiveness 4, 3
  • Shorter duration of gait disturbance predicts better outcomes (p<0.01) 4
  • Validated testing should include: Timed "Up & Go", Tinetti Gait and Balance Assessment, Berg Balance Scale, Mini Mental Status Exam, Trail Making Test Part B 3
  • Mean Tinetti score improvement of 4.27 points after lumbar drain distinguishes shunt responders from non-responders (p<0.001) 3

Alternative Treatment: Endoscopic Third Ventriculostomy (ETV)

ETV has emerged as an alternative with distinct advantages and limitations:

  • Lower long-term complication rates compared to VP shunts 2, 1, 5
  • Higher early failure rates than shunts but lower failure rates after 3 months 2, 1, 5
  • Equivalent overall outcomes to VP shunts when adjusted for patient age and etiology 2, 5
  • Preferred when suitable anatomy exists, particularly in aqueductal stenosis 1

The Congress of Neurological Surgeons provides Level II evidence that both CSF shunts and ETV are acceptable options, though VP shunt remains more commonly utilized. 5

Critical Complications to Monitor

Short-Term Complications (within 6 months):

  • Subdural fluid collections occur in 18% of patients 3
  • Misplaced proximal catheters, asymptomatic hemorrhages, and CSF leaks 4
  • Overall complication rate approximately 6% including seizure, intracerebral hemorrhage, and stroke 3

Long-Term Complications:

  • Infection risk of 11% within 24 months requiring complete shunt removal with systemic antibiotics 1
  • Symptom recurrence in 45% of patients at 1-year follow-up despite initial improvement 1, 3
  • Shunt occlusion occurs in 7% of patients during follow-up 6

What NOT to Do

Serial lumbar punctures are NOT recommended as definitive treatment (Level I evidence, high clinical certainty). 7, 5 They do not reduce the need for shunt placement or prevent hydrocephalus progression. 7

Optimal Valve Settings

For programmable valves in VP shunts:

  • Median opening pressure: 120 mmH₂O for women, 140 mmH₂O for men 8
  • Valve settings should prioritize clinical condition over radiological findings, as these parameters are independent of each other 8

Prognostic Factors

Positive predictors of shunt success:

  • Shorter duration of symptoms before treatment 4
  • Use of cognition-enhancing medications predicts improvement in cognition and incontinence (p<0.05) 4

Negative predictors:

  • Diabetes mellitus and history of stroke correlate with worse surgical outcomes (p<0.05) 8

References

Guideline

Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus Management

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Treatment of Hydrocephalus in the Elderly

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Treatment of Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus (NPH)

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Related Questions

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.