Imaging for Unrelenting Tennis Elbow (Lateral Epicondylitis)
For unrelenting tennis elbow, radiographs should be obtained as initial imaging, followed by MRI if symptoms persist, as MRI shows high inter- and intraobserver reliability with 90-100% sensitivity and 83% specificity for confirming epicondylalgia. 1, 2
Initial Imaging Approach
- Radiographs (X-rays) are the appropriate first-line imaging for chronic elbow pain, including lateral epicondylitis 1
- Radiographs can identify potential causes of pain such as intra-articular bodies, heterotopic ossification, osteochondral lesions, soft tissue calcification, occult fractures, or osteoarthritis 1
- Comparison with the asymptomatic side is often useful for better evaluation 1
Advanced Imaging Options (When Radiographs Are Normal or Nonspecific)
MRI Elbow
- MRI is the preferred advanced imaging for unrelenting tennis elbow with high diagnostic accuracy 2
- MRI demonstrates high inter- and intraobserver reliability with 90-100% sensitivity and 83% specificity for epicondylalgia 1
- Most specific MRI findings include intermediate to high T2 signal within the common extensor tendon and paratendinous soft tissue edema 1
- MRI can also identify associated findings such as radial collateral and lateral ulnar collateral ligament injuries that may contribute to persistent symptoms 1
- MRI facilitates surgical planning when conservative management fails 1
Ultrasound Examination
- Ultrasound shows moderate agreement with MRI for diagnosing common extensor tendon tears (sensitivity 64.25%, specificity 85.19%) 2
- Advanced ultrasound techniques have improved diagnostic accuracy:
When to Consider Other Imaging Modalities
- CT arthrography or CT elbow: Consider when suspecting loose bodies, heterotopic ossification, or osteophytosis (sensitivity 93%, specificity 66% for loose bodies) 1
- 3-Phase bone scan: Limited evidence for routine use in tennis elbow, but can detect chronic epicondylalgia when other imaging is inconclusive 1
- MR arthrography: Does not add additional information compared to standard MRI for epicondylalgia 1
Clinical Considerations and Pitfalls
- Persistent symptoms despite negative initial imaging should prompt consideration of advanced imaging 2
- Pain may be referred from cervical spine pathology or radial tunnel syndrome, requiring further investigation when provocative tests are negative 2
- In refractory cases, MRI can identify specific pathology (such as granulation tissue with high T2 signal) that may guide surgical intervention 3
- Failure to identify underlying pathology with appropriate imaging may lead to continued symptoms and disability despite conservative treatment 3