Is coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) usually a contaminant in blood cultures?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 13, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci in Blood Cultures: Usually Contaminants

Coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) are most commonly contaminants rather than true pathogens when isolated from blood cultures, with approximately 65-94% of CoNS-positive blood cultures representing contamination rather than true bloodstream infection. 1, 2, 3

Distinguishing Contamination from True Infection

Key Indicators of True Bacteremia

  • Multiple positive blood cultures: A high proportion of positive blood cultures from multiple sites is the best indication of true CoNS bacteremia 1
  • Clinical signs of infection: The presence of systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria significantly increases the likelihood of true infection 4
  • Presence of intravascular devices: Patients with central venous catheters are 5.38 times more likely to have true CoNS bacteremia 4

Laboratory Indicators

  • Time to positivity: Blood cultures that become positive in ≤16 hours suggest high bacterial load (>100 CFU/ml) and true infection, while those becoming positive after >20 hours typically represent contamination (<10 CFU/ml) 5
  • Quantitative blood cultures: Higher colony counts (>100 CFU/ml) correlate with true infection, while low counts (<10 CFU/ml) typically represent contamination 5

Clinical Algorithm for Interpreting CoNS Blood Cultures

Likely True Infection if:

  • Two or more blood cultures positive for the same CoNS species within 5 days 2
  • One positive blood culture plus:
    • ≥3 SIRS criteria (fever/hypothermia, tachycardia, tachypnea, leukocytosis/leukopenia) 4
    • Or 2 SIRS criteria plus presence of a central venous catheter 4
  • Time to positivity ≤16 hours 5

Likely Contamination if:

  • Single positive blood culture with negative concurrent cultures 1
  • Time to positivity >20 hours 5
  • Low colony count (<10 CFU/ml) 5
  • Absence of clinical signs of infection 4

Management Implications

When CoNS is Likely a Contaminant:

  • Avoid unnecessary antibiotic therapy, particularly vancomycin 1
  • Obtain additional blood cultures (when not on antibiotics) to confirm absence of bacteremia 1
  • Continue to monitor patient clinically 2

When CoNS is Likely a True Infection:

  • For uncomplicated catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI):
    • Treat with antibiotics for 5-7 days if catheter is removed 1
    • Treat for 10-14 days with antibiotic lock therapy if catheter is retained 1
  • Consider catheter removal, especially with short-term catheters 1

Special Considerations

Exception: Staphylococcus lugdunensis

  • Despite being a CoNS, S. lugdunensis should be managed similarly to S. aureus due to its higher virulence and ability to cause endocarditis and metastatic infections 1

Hospital Department Variations

  • Emergency departments typically have higher rates of CoNS contamination (up to 3.3% of blood cultures) 3
  • Inappropriate vancomycin use for contaminants is more common in ward patients 3

Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Don't automatically treat a single positive CoNS blood culture with vancomycin 1
  • Don't assume all CoNS species have equal clinical significance (S. lugdunensis is more virulent) 1
  • Don't overlook the importance of proper blood culture collection technique in reducing contamination rates 1
  • Don't dismiss CoNS in immunocompromised patients or those with prosthetic devices, as these populations are at higher risk for true CoNS infections 6

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.