What is the best method for parathyroid gland localization intraoperatively when the surgeon cannot detect it normally?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 14, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Indocyanine Green Fluorescence is the Best Method for Intraoperative Parathyroid Gland Localization

Indocyanine green fluorescence is the most effective method for intraoperative parathyroid gland localization when the surgeon cannot detect it normally, due to its high accuracy and real-time visualization capabilities.

Comparison of Available Methods

Indocyanine Green (ICG) Fluorescence

  • Provides real-time, high-contrast visualization of parathyroid tissue during surgery 1
  • Allows for both identification and assessment of parathyroid gland viability in the operative field 2
  • Creates clear visual distinction between parathyroid tissue and surrounding structures 1
  • Can detect both normal and pathological parathyroid tissue regardless of disease state 3
  • Utilizes near-infrared fluorescence technology which has shown detection rates of 76.3%-100% of parathyroid glands intraoperatively 4

Intraoperative Ultrasound (USG)

  • Limited utility in the intraoperative setting compared to preoperative localization 5
  • Sensitivity varies widely in literature, ranging from 44% to 97% 5
  • Particularly limited in detecting ectopic or posterior glands during surgery 5
  • Effectiveness decreases significantly with multigland disease 5

CT Scanning

  • More valuable as a preoperative rather than intraoperative tool 5
  • Requires contrast administration and radiation exposure 5
  • Not practical for real-time intraoperative guidance 5
  • Better suited for preoperative planning rather than intraoperative decision-making 5

Sestamibi Scanning

  • Primarily used for preoperative localization rather than intraoperative identification 5
  • Sensitivity varies widely (41%-96%) and decreases with multigland disease 5
  • Limited utility in the intraoperative setting due to technical constraints 5
  • Not designed for real-time surgical guidance 5

Advantages of ICG Fluorescence for Intraoperative Use

  • Provides immediate, real-time feedback to the surgeon during the procedure 2
  • Does not require preoperative injection of contrast agents for parathyroid autofluorescence detection 6
  • Can identify parathyroid tissue even when anatomically distorted or in ectopic locations 1
  • Helps reduce the risk of inadvertent parathyroidectomy during thyroid surgery 1
  • Particularly valuable in reoperative cases where scarring and anatomical distortion make identification challenging 2

Clinical Implementation

  • ICG fluorescence can be implemented using commercially available photodynamic eye (PDE) systems 6
  • The technique works by detecting the natural fluorescence of parathyroid tissue when exposed to near-infrared light 3
  • Parathyroid glands show significantly higher fluorescence intensity than surrounding tissues including thyroid, lymph nodes, and fat 6
  • The signal strength is consistent and effective regardless of parathyroid pathology 3

Potential Pitfalls and Limitations

  • Surgeon familiarity with the technology and interpretation of fluorescence patterns is essential 2
  • Equipment availability may vary between institutions 4
  • While highly sensitive, confirmation with visual inspection and surgical experience remains important 1
  • In cases of severely diseased glands, fluorescence intensity may vary but still remains detectable 3

Conclusion

When the surgeon cannot detect parathyroid glands through normal visual inspection, indocyanine green fluorescence provides the most reliable intraoperative localization method. Its ability to provide real-time visualization, high detection rates, and assessment of gland viability makes it superior to alternatives like intraoperative ultrasound, CT scanning, or sestamibi scanning for intraoperative use.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.