What is the role of immunotherapy in the treatment of nasopharyngeal (nasopharynx) cancer?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 15, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Role of Immunotherapy in Nasopharyngeal Cancer Treatment

Immunotherapy has emerged as a promising treatment strategy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), with recent phase III trials demonstrating improved progression-free survival when added to first-line chemotherapy for recurrent and/or metastatic disease. 1

Immunotherapy in Recurrent/Metastatic NPC

First-line Treatment

  • Two randomized phase III trials have shown increased progression-free survival when immunotherapy (camrelizumab or toripalimab) was added to first-line cisplatin and gemcitabine, followed by maintenance immunotherapy for recurrent/metastatic NPC 1
  • The addition of immunotherapy to chemotherapy should be considered for first-line treatment of recurrent/metastatic NPC, though long-term overall survival benefits are still pending evaluation 1

Monotherapy in Later Lines

  • PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitors have demonstrated activity as monotherapy in recurrent/metastatic NPC 1
  • Nivolumab, pembrolizumab, and camrelizumab have shown overall response rates of 20%, 25%, and 34% respectively as monotherapy 1
  • Most responses to immunotherapy occur at first radiological evaluation 1
  • Responses to immunotherapy appear to be more durable than with conventional treatments 2

Factors Affecting Response to Immunotherapy

  • Lower disease burden (fewer than three metastatic sites) is associated with better response to immune checkpoint inhibitors 2
  • Patients with metastatic disease at initial diagnosis may have lower response rates to immunotherapy 2
  • Decline in EBV DNA levels correlates significantly with response to immunotherapy 2

Rationale for Immunotherapy in NPC

  • NPC has a strong association with Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), making it potentially responsive to immunotherapy approaches that target viral antigens 1, 3
  • The tumor microenvironment in NPC is characterized by immune cell infiltration, suggesting potential responsiveness to immune-based approaches 3, 4
  • Multiple immune checkpoints are expressed in NPC tumors, including PD-L1, B7-H3, B7-H4, IDO-1, VISTA, ICOS, and OX40 4

Other Immunotherapy Approaches

  • Cytotoxic T-cell lymphocyte (CTL) adoptive immunotherapy has shown activity in heavily pre-treated NPC patients 1
  • Cancer vaccines targeting EBV antigens have been explored but with less clinical success than adoptive T cell therapy 3
  • Combining radiotherapy with immunotherapy may enhance anti-tumor immune responses through increased tumor antigen release 5

Current Recommendations and Limitations

  • Immunotherapy is still considered investigational in many settings for NPC, with therapeutic positioning still being defined 1
  • No standard second-line treatment exists for recurrent/metastatic NPC, but immunotherapy represents a promising strategy in this setting 1
  • Biomarker development for patient selection is ongoing, with immune checkpoint expression patterns and EBV DNA levels showing potential utility 4, 2

Practical Considerations

  • Treatment decisions should be discussed in a multidisciplinary team setting 1
  • Safety profile of immunotherapy in NPC appears manageable based on available data 2
  • For patients with oligometastatic disease, aggressive local treatments combined with systemic therapy may achieve long-term survival 1

The integration of immunotherapy into NPC treatment paradigms represents a significant advance, particularly for recurrent/metastatic disease where treatment options have been limited. As more data emerges, immunotherapy is likely to become a standard component of NPC management.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.