What is the role of immunotherapy, including checkpoint inhibitors like pembrolizumab (pembrolizumab) or nivolumab (nivolumab), in the treatment of nasopharyngeal cancer?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: August 8, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Role of Immunotherapy in Nasopharyngeal Cancer

Immunotherapy with PD-1 inhibitors combined with gemcitabine and cisplatin should be offered as first-line treatment for patients with recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal cancer, with toripalimab, camrelizumab, or tislelizumab being the preferred agents. 1

First-Line Treatment for Recurrent/Metastatic Disease

Preferred Regimens

  • First-line therapy: PD-1 inhibitor + gemcitabine + cisplatin
    • Preferred agents: toripalimab, camrelizumab, or tislelizumab 1
    • Alternative agents (if preferred agents unavailable): pembrolizumab or nivolumab with gemcitabine and cisplatin 1

This recommendation is based on high-quality evidence showing significant benefits in terms of mortality and morbidity outcomes, with a strong recommendation strength according to the ASCO guidelines 1.

Alternative First-Line Option

  • For patients who cannot receive immunotherapy: Cisplatin + gemcitabine is the standard first-line chemotherapy choice 1

Second-Line Treatment Options

For patients who progress after platinum-based therapy:

  • PD-1 inhibitors (nivolumab, pembrolizumab, camrelizumab) may be offered as monotherapy 1
    • Response rates: camrelizumab (34.1%), pembrolizumab (26.3%), nivolumab (19.0%) 2
    • Strength of recommendation: Weak (based on low-quality evidence) 1

Biomarker Testing

  • PD-L1 testing: PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS) ≥1 correlates with better response to PD-1 inhibitors
    • Pooled objective response rate: 28.4% for PD-L1-positive vs. 17.4% for PD-L1-negative patients 2
  • TMB testing: May be performed when CPS is not available 1
    • TMB ≥10 should be interpreted as high and correlates with clinical benefit to PD-1 inhibitors 1

Special Clinical Scenarios

Oligometastatic Disease

  • For patients with limited metastatic burden:
    • Consider aggressive treatment including chemotherapy, surgery, or definitive radiation therapy to metastatic sites 1
    • Radiation therapy is safe to give concurrently with immunotherapy for palliation or local control 1
    • In newly diagnosed metastatic NPC, adding locoregional RT to systemic therapy improves locoregional control and overall survival 1

Locally Recurrent Disease

  • For local recurrences not invading the carotid artery or extending intracranially:
    • Consider nasopharyngectomy (especially for rT1-rT3) 1
    • Endoscopic nasopharyngectomy may be superior to IMRT for selected cases 1
    • For lymphatic recurrences in the neck: neck dissection is recommended 1

Safety Considerations

  • Toxicity profiles of PD-1 inhibitors:
    • Nivolumab and pembrolizumab have shown optimal safety regarding overall adverse events 2
    • Camrelizumab and nivolumab demonstrated better safety profiles regarding grade 3-5 adverse events 2
    • Combination therapy (immunotherapy + chemotherapy) has higher rates of adverse events than monotherapy 2

Rationale for Immunotherapy in NPC

Nasopharyngeal carcinoma is particularly suitable for immunotherapy due to:

  1. Strong association with Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection 3, 4
  2. Dense lymphocytic infiltration in tumor stroma 5
  3. Positive PD-L1 expression in tumor cells 5

Clinical Pearls and Pitfalls

  • Patient selection is crucial for re-irradiation due to high incidence of major late complications, even with modern RT techniques 1
  • Pre-treatment circulating EBV DNA is a prognostic factor for distant metastasis in candidates for surgery and for patients treated with first-line chemotherapy 1
  • Combination therapy (immunotherapy + chemotherapy) achieves dramatically higher response rates than chemotherapy alone (90.9% vs. 64.1%) but with increased toxicity 2
  • For patients with high burden of distant metastases (more than two distant sites, mainly visceral involvement), systemic treatment should be prioritized over locoregional treatment unless symptoms occur 1

By incorporating immunotherapy into treatment algorithms for nasopharyngeal cancer, particularly for recurrent or metastatic disease, clinicians can significantly improve patient outcomes in terms of response rates and potentially survival.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.