What is the role of Immunotherapy (IO) in nasopharyngeal carcinoma?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 20, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Role of Immunotherapy in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

Immunotherapy has become a cornerstone of treatment for recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma, with PD-1 inhibitors combined with chemotherapy now representing the standard first-line approach based on high-quality evidence demonstrating improved survival outcomes. 1

First-Line Treatment for Recurrent/Metastatic Disease

The preferred first-line regimen is toripalimab, camrelizumab, or tislelizumab combined with gemcitabine and cisplatin, which carries a strong ASCO recommendation based on high-quality evidence. 1 This combination approach has demonstrated:

  • Median progression-free survival of 11.7 months versus 8.0 months with chemotherapy alone (HR 0.52,95% CI 0.36-0.74) 2
  • 40% reduction in risk of death (HR 0.603,95% CI 0.364-0.997) 2
  • Benefit regardless of PD-L1 expression status, eliminating the need for biomarker testing before treatment initiation 2

Alternative First-Line Options

If the preferred PD-1 inhibitors (toripalimab, camrelizumab, tislelizumab) are unavailable, pembrolizumab or nivolumab may be substituted with gemcitabine and cisplatin. 1

Treatment Regimen Specifics

The standard dosing protocol consists of:

  • Toripalimab 240 mg IV every 21 days 2
  • Gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m² on days 1 and 8 2
  • Cisplatin 80 mg/m² on day 1, every 21 days 2
  • Up to 6 cycles of combination therapy, followed by maintenance immunotherapy for up to 2 years 2

Second-Line and Beyond

For patients who have progressed following platinum-based therapy, PD-1 inhibitors may be offered as monotherapy, though this carries a weaker recommendation based on lower quality evidence. 1

Monotherapy response rates in the second-line setting include:

  • Nivolumab: 20% overall response rate 3
  • Pembrolizumab: 25% overall response rate 3
  • Camrelizumab: 34% overall response rate 3

Real-world data from nonendemic regions shows an overall response rate of 26.2% with immunotherapy in pretreated patients, with median PFS of 5.6 months and median OS of 19.1 months. 4

Biological Rationale

The strong association between nasopharyngeal carcinoma and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) makes this tumor particularly responsive to immunotherapy approaches. 3 The virus-associated antigens create an immunogenic tumor microenvironment that can be effectively targeted by checkpoint inhibitors. 5, 6

Biomarker Testing

PD-L1 testing is not required for treatment decisions in nasopharyngeal carcinoma, as clinical benefit is observed regardless of PD-L1 expression level. 2 This distinguishes NPC from other head and neck squamous cell carcinomas where PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS) ≥1 is used to guide therapy. 1

EBV DNA levels may serve as a predictive biomarker, with decline in EBV DNA associated with response to immunotherapy. 4 Patients with lower disease burden (fewer than three metastatic sites) and those without metastatic disease at initial diagnosis show higher probability of responding to checkpoint inhibitors. 4

Combination with Radiation Therapy

For oligometastatic disease, radiation therapy is safe to give concurrently with immunotherapy for palliation or local control, but should not be given specifically to enhance immunotherapy response outside of clinical trials. 1 This recommendation is based on moderate-quality evidence showing no net benefit for the abscopal effect strategy. 7

Emerging Approaches

Beyond PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitors, other immunotherapy strategies are under investigation:

  • Adoptive T-cell therapy targeting EBV antigens has shown activity in heavily pretreated patients 3
  • EBV-specific cytotoxic T-lymphocyte therapy demonstrates a disease control rate of approximately 46% (combining stable disease and response rates) in pretreated patients 8
  • Combinations with antiangiogenic agents, cancer vaccines, and novel checkpoint inhibitors beyond PD-1/PD-L1 are being explored 5

Critical Pitfalls to Avoid

Do not withhold immunotherapy based on PD-L1 status in nasopharyngeal carcinoma—this differs from other head and neck cancers where biomarker-driven selection is standard. 2

Do not use immunotherapy monotherapy in the first-line setting when patients are fit for combination therapy—the evidence strongly supports chemotherapy plus immunotherapy over either modality alone. 1

Do not add radiation therapy to immunotherapy solely to enhance systemic response—this strategy lacks evidence of benefit and should be reserved for local control needs or clinical trial settings. 1

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Toripalimab Treatment for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Role of Immunotherapy in Nasopharyngeal Cancer Treatment

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Current status and advances of immunotherapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Therapeutic advances in medical oncology, 2022

Research

Immunotherapy for nasopharyngeal cancer-a review.

Chinese clinical oncology, 2016

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.