What is the management of shock?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 15, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Management of Shock

The management of shock requires a standardized approach focused on rapid diagnosis, early intervention, ongoing hemodynamic assessment, and multidisciplinary longitudinal care to reduce mortality rates that currently exceed 40%. 1

Types of Shock and Initial Assessment

  • Shock is a state of systemic imbalance between supply and demand for oxygenated blood, characterized by a low cardiac output that often leads to multiorgan system failure and death 1, 2
  • Four main categories of shock: cardiogenic, hypovolemic, distributive (including septic), and obstructive 3
  • Clinical criteria for shock diagnosis include:
    • Systolic blood pressure <90 mmHg for 30 minutes or requiring inotropes/vasopressors to maintain SBP >90 mmHg
    • Evidence of end-organ hypoperfusion
    • Lactate >2 mmol/L 1
  • Hemodynamic criteria include:
    • Cardiac index <1.8 L/min/m² without vasopressors/inotropes
    • Cardiac power output <0.6 W 1

Immediate Management Priorities

Volume Resuscitation

  • For hypovolemic and distributive shock, fluid therapy is a leading management strategy 4
  • Balanced crystalloids (normal saline or Ringer's lactate) can be used interchangeably for acute volume replacement 2
  • In burn injuries, after the first 24 hours, albumin (Plasbumin-25) can be used to maintain plasma colloid osmotic pressure 5
  • For hypovolemic shock, the volume administered and speed of infusion should be adapted to individual patient response 5

Vasopressor and Inotropic Support

  • Norepinephrine is the preferred vasopressor in septic shock and profound cardiogenic shock 6
  • For patients with left ventricular-dominant cardiogenic shock and normotensive hypoperfusion:
    • Pure vasodilators like nitroprusside may improve cardiac output by reducing afterload
    • Milrinone and dobutamine can be effective for high-afterload LV failure 1
  • For right ventricular failure, intravenous or inhaled pulmonary vasodilators can reduce RV afterload 1
  • Dobutamine remains the first-line inotropic therapy when myocardial function is depressed 1

Specific Management Based on Shock Type

Cardiogenic Shock

  • Early revascularization for acute myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock 1
  • Consider mechanical circulatory support (MCS) in refractory shock based on:
    • Cardiac index <2.2 L/min/m²
    • Cardiac power output <0.6 W
    • Lactate elevation despite initial therapy 1
  • Tailor MCS device selection based on shock phenotype (LV-dominant, RV-dominant, or biventricular) 1
  • Contraindications to MCS include anoxic brain injury, irreversible end-organ failure, prohibitive vascular access, and DNR status 1

Septic Shock

  • Effective antibiotic therapy is the cornerstone of treatment for septic shock 2
  • Norepinephrine is the preferred vasopressor 1, 6
  • Consider vasopressin or angiotensin II for their norepinephrine-sparing effects 1

Hypovolemic Shock

  • Rapid volume replacement with crystalloids or colloids based on the cause and severity 5
  • For hypoproteinemia during major surgery or in sepsis/intensive care patients, albumin (Plasbumin-25) may be valuable 5
  • In Adult Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) with hypoproteinemia and fluid volume overload, albumin with a diuretic may be beneficial 5

Advanced Monitoring and Multidisciplinary Care

  • Early invasive hemodynamic assessment using pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) to guide therapy 1
  • Point-of-care ultrasound helps evaluate undifferentiated shock and determine fluid responsiveness 6
  • Implement a multidisciplinary shock team approach with standardized protocols 1
  • For optimal outcomes, consider transfer to dedicated Level 1 shock centers with full spectrum capabilities 1
  • Ongoing hemodynamic assessment and titration of therapies to the minimal efficacious dose 1

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Inadequate or excessive fluid administration can lead to complications, organ failure, and increased mortality 4
  • Delayed recognition of shock transition from one type to another (requires continual reassessment) 3
  • Failure to identify and address the underlying cause of shock 6, 3
  • Overreliance on a single monitoring parameter rather than integrating multiple clinical and hemodynamic data points 4
  • Delayed escalation to mechanical circulatory support in refractory cardiogenic shock 1

Special Considerations

  • In acute liver failure, albumin administration may support colloid osmotic pressure and bind excess plasma bilirubin 5
  • For shock associated with protein-rich fluid sequestration (peritonitis, pancreatitis, mediastinitis), albumin infusion may be required 5
  • Minimize intrathoracic positive pressure ventilation, correct acidosis, and improve oxygenation in RV failure 1

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Aspects of the management of shock.

Annals of internal medicine, 1980

Research

The Intensivist's Perspective of Shock, Volume Management, and Hemodynamic Monitoring.

Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN, 2022

Research

Circulatory shock in adults in emergency department.

Turkish journal of emergency medicine, 2023

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.