What are the recommendations of the Tokyo Guidelines 2018 for managing acute cholangitis and cholecystitis?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 18, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Tokyo Guidelines 2018 for Managing Acute Cholangitis and Cholecystitis

The Tokyo Guidelines 2018 (TG18) provide a comprehensive management strategy for acute cholangitis and cholecystitis based on severity assessment, with early biliary drainage recommended for moderate to severe cholangitis and laparoscopic cholecystectomy as the first-line treatment for mild to moderate cholecystitis.

Acute Cholangitis Management

Severity Assessment

  • TG18 classifies acute cholangitis into three grades 1:
    • Grade I (mild): No organ dysfunction
    • Grade II (moderate): Risk of increased severity without early biliary drainage
    • Grade III (severe): Presence of organ dysfunction

Treatment Recommendations by Severity

  • Grade I (Mild) Cholangitis:

    • Initial medical treatment with antimicrobial agents is sufficient for most cases 2
    • For non-responders to initial medical treatment, biliary drainage should be considered 2
    • Treatment for underlying etiology (e.g., endoscopic sphincterotomy for choledocholithiasis) might be performed simultaneously with biliary drainage if possible 2
  • Grade II (Moderate) Cholangitis:

    • Early biliary drainage along with antibiotic administration is recommended 2
    • Treatment for underlying etiology should be performed after the patient's condition improves 2
  • Grade III (Severe) Cholangitis:

    • Appropriate organ support is required 2
    • After hemodynamic stabilization, urgent endoscopic or percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage should be performed 2
    • Treatment for underlying etiology should follow after patient stabilization 2

Antibiotic Therapy

  • Empiric broad-spectrum antibiotics should be started promptly 1:
    • For septic shock: administer within 1 hour
    • Otherwise: administer within 4 hours and before drainage procedures
  • Recommended antibiotics for biliary infections include piperacillin/tazobactam, imipenem/cilastatin, meropenem, ertapenem, or aztreonam 1
  • In cases of shock, add amikacin; for fragility or delayed diagnosis, add fluconazole 1
  • Duration of antibiotic therapy 1:
    • Additional 4 days after successful biliary drainage
    • 2 weeks if Enterococcus or Streptococcus is present (to prevent endocarditis)
    • 5-7 days for biloma and generalized peritonitis

Biliary Drainage Options

  • Endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC) is the preferred method 1
  • Alternative options include percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography (PTC), EUS-guided drainage, or surgical drainage 1
  • Endoscopic options include biliary stent or nasobiliary drain placement 1
  • Urgent ERCP (within 24 hours) has demonstrated mortality benefits across all age groups 3

Acute Cholecystitis Management

Severity Assessment

  • TG18 classifies acute cholecystitis into three grades 4:
    • Grade I (mild)
    • Grade II (moderate)
    • Grade III (severe)

Treatment Recommendations by Severity

  • Grade I (Mild) Cholecystitis:

    • Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy (Lap-C) is recommended for patients with Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) ≤5 and ASA-PS ≤2 4
  • Grade II (Moderate) Cholecystitis:

    • For patients with CCI ≤5 and ASA-PS ≤2: early Lap-C performed by experienced surgeons 4
    • For others: medical treatment and/or gallbladder drainage followed by delayed Lap-C 4
  • Grade III (Severe) Cholecystitis:

    • Appropriate organ support plus initial medical treatment 2
    • Urgent or early gallbladder drainage is recommended 2
    • TG18 update: Lap-C may be indicated for selected Grade III patients with favorable organ system failure and negative predictive factors, who meet criteria of CCI ≤3 and ASA-PS ≤2, when performed at advanced centers by experienced surgeons 4
    • Elective cholecystectomy can be performed after improvement of acute inflammation 2

Diagnostic Approach

Acute Cholangitis

  • TG18 diagnostic criteria have demonstrated improved specificity (63%) and accuracy (81%) compared to clinical assessment alone 5
  • Diagnostic workup includes:
    • Laboratory tests: liver function tests (bilirubin, AST, ALT, ALP, GGT) 1
    • For critically ill patients: CRP, PCT, and lactate levels help evaluate severity 1
    • Imaging: abdominal triphasic CT as first-line, complemented by CE-MRCP for exact visualization of biliary duct injury 1
    • EUS and MRCP have high sensitivity (93% and 85%) and specificity (96% and 93%) for CBD stone detection 1

Acute Cholecystitis

  • Prompt investigation for patients with alarm symptoms (fever, abdominal pain, distention, jaundice, nausea, vomiting) 1
  • Abdominal triphasic CT is suggested as first-line diagnostic imaging 1

Clinical Pitfalls and Caveats

  • Failure to initiate early antibiotic therapy in suspected cholangitis can lead to increased mortality 1
  • Delay in biliary drainage for moderate to severe cholangitis worsens outcomes 2
  • Bile cultures should be obtained during drainage procedures to guide antibiotic therapy 1
  • The presence of residual stones or ongoing biliary obstruction requires extended antimicrobial treatment 1
  • For elderly patients (≥80 years), be aware of higher risk of post-sphincterotomy bleeding, though urgent ERCP remains beneficial regardless of age 3
  • Recognize that some Grade III acute cholecystitis patients can safely undergo laparoscopic cholecystectomy when strict criteria are met and the procedure is performed by experienced surgeons at advanced centers 4

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.