Role of Lumen-Apposing Metal Stent (LAMS) Procedure in Treating Gallstones
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage (EUS-GBD) using lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS) is an effective alternative to percutaneous drainage for high-risk surgical patients with gallstone-related acute cholecystitis, offering fewer adverse events, lower pain scores, and reduced need for reinterventions. 1
Indications for LAMS in Gallstone Management
- EUS-GBD with LAMS is indicated for patients with acute cholecystitis who are poor surgical candidates due to significant medical comorbidities 1
- Particularly beneficial for patients with:
- Not recommended in cases of gallbladder perforation, biliary peritonitis, large-volume ascites, or significant coagulopathy 1
Technical Aspects of the LAMS Procedure
- Two approaches for performing EUS-GBD with LAMS:
- Non-cautery enhanced method: Requires puncturing the gallbladder with a fine-needle aspiration needle, followed by guidewire insertion, track dilation, and stent placement under fluoroscopic guidance 1
- Direct method (cautery-enhanced): Allows direct entry into the gallbladder and stent deployment without device exchange 1
- LAMS sizes typically used include:
- Saddle lengths of 10 and 15 mm
- Inner diameters of 10,15, and 20 mm
- Bilateral anchor flanges of 21,24, and 29 mm 1
- For safe deployment, the distance between the enteral puncture site and gallbladder lumen should be less than 10 mm 1
Efficacy for Gallstone Management
- Technical success rates of 95.1-98% for EUS-GBD with LAMS 2, 3
- Clinical success rates of 91.6-96.3% 2
- Allows for subsequent gallstone management through the created fistula:
- Even giant gallstones can be successfully managed through LAMS using endoscopic laser lithotripsy 4
Advantages Over Percutaneous Drainage
- Lower postprocedure pain scores (2.5 vs 6.5 for percutaneous drainage) 3
- Shorter hospital stays (3 days vs 9 days) 3
- Significantly fewer repeat interventions (0.2 vs 2.5 per patient) 3, 5
- Lower risk of recurrent cholecystitis compared to percutaneous drainage (relative risk: 1.089 vs 2.02) 1
- Fewer adverse events (16% vs 44%) 5
Post-Procedure Management Options
- Two main approaches after resolution of cholecystitis:
- Follow-up peroral cholecystoscopy at 4-6 weeks:
- Permanent LAMS placement:
Adverse Events and Limitations
- Overall adverse event rate of 10.6-27.6%, including:
- Mortality rate of 3.9%, predominantly due to ongoing sepsis 1
- Procedure requires advanced EUS training with a learning curve of approximately 19-25 procedures 1
- Currently an off-label use of LAMS technology in the United States 1
Future Directions
- More data needed for FDA approval of LAMS specifically for gallbladder drainage 1
- Emerging applications include use as a salvage maneuver for biliary drainage 1
- Potential for endoscopic management of symptomatic gallstones to become more mainstream, though cholecystectomy remains the standard of care 1