What is the role of the Lumen-Apposing Metal Stent (LAMS) procedure in treating gallstones?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 19, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Role of Lumen-Apposing Metal Stent (LAMS) Procedure in Treating Gallstones

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage (EUS-GBD) using lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS) is an effective alternative to percutaneous drainage for high-risk surgical patients with gallstone-related acute cholecystitis, offering fewer adverse events, lower pain scores, and reduced need for reinterventions. 1

Indications for LAMS in Gallstone Management

  • EUS-GBD with LAMS is indicated for patients with acute cholecystitis who are poor surgical candidates due to significant medical comorbidities 1
  • Particularly beneficial for patients with:
    • Uncovered metal biliary stents 1
    • Malignant obstruction of the cystic duct 1
    • High-volume cholelithiasis requiring therapeutic intervention 1
  • Not recommended in cases of gallbladder perforation, biliary peritonitis, large-volume ascites, or significant coagulopathy 1

Technical Aspects of the LAMS Procedure

  • Two approaches for performing EUS-GBD with LAMS:
    • Non-cautery enhanced method: Requires puncturing the gallbladder with a fine-needle aspiration needle, followed by guidewire insertion, track dilation, and stent placement under fluoroscopic guidance 1
    • Direct method (cautery-enhanced): Allows direct entry into the gallbladder and stent deployment without device exchange 1
  • LAMS sizes typically used include:
    • Saddle lengths of 10 and 15 mm
    • Inner diameters of 10,15, and 20 mm
    • Bilateral anchor flanges of 21,24, and 29 mm 1
  • For safe deployment, the distance between the enteral puncture site and gallbladder lumen should be less than 10 mm 1

Efficacy for Gallstone Management

  • Technical success rates of 95.1-98% for EUS-GBD with LAMS 2, 3
  • Clinical success rates of 91.6-96.3% 2
  • Allows for subsequent gallstone management through the created fistula:
    • 56% of patients experience spontaneous stone passage through the LAMS 1
    • Remaining patients can undergo stone removal with retrieval baskets or laser lithotripsy 1
    • Overall stone clearance rate of 88% after an average of 1.25 cholecystoscopy sessions 1
  • Even giant gallstones can be successfully managed through LAMS using endoscopic laser lithotripsy 4

Advantages Over Percutaneous Drainage

  • Lower postprocedure pain scores (2.5 vs 6.5 for percutaneous drainage) 3
  • Shorter hospital stays (3 days vs 9 days) 3
  • Significantly fewer repeat interventions (0.2 vs 2.5 per patient) 3, 5
  • Lower risk of recurrent cholecystitis compared to percutaneous drainage (relative risk: 1.089 vs 2.02) 1
  • Fewer adverse events (16% vs 44%) 5

Post-Procedure Management Options

  • Two main approaches after resolution of cholecystitis:
    1. Follow-up peroral cholecystoscopy at 4-6 weeks:
      • Exchange LAMS for double pigtail plastic stents for long-term fistula maintenance 1
      • Complete stone removal if not passed spontaneously 1
    2. Permanent LAMS placement:
      • Suitable for frail patients and those refusing a second procedure 1
      • Long-term outcomes show low delayed adverse events (7.1%) 1
      • 3-year stent patency of 86% 1

Adverse Events and Limitations

  • Overall adverse event rate of 10.6-27.6%, including:
    • Procedural complications (4.9%): stent misdeployment, bleeding 2, 6
    • Follow-up complications (5.7%): stent dislodgement, blockage, leak, peritonitis 2
  • Mortality rate of 3.9%, predominantly due to ongoing sepsis 1
  • Procedure requires advanced EUS training with a learning curve of approximately 19-25 procedures 1
  • Currently an off-label use of LAMS technology in the United States 1

Future Directions

  • More data needed for FDA approval of LAMS specifically for gallbladder drainage 1
  • Emerging applications include use as a salvage maneuver for biliary drainage 1
  • Potential for endoscopic management of symptomatic gallstones to become more mainstream, though cholecystectomy remains the standard of care 1

Training Requirements

  • Procedure should be performed by experts in advanced therapeutic EUS 1
  • Recommended training progression:
    • First achieve competency with LAMS for pancreatic fluid collections (≥10 successful independent deployments) 1
    • Then progress to significantly distended gallbladders with no intervening tissue 1

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Similar Efficacies of Endoscopic Ultrasound Gallbladder Drainage With a Lumen-Apposing Metal Stent Versus Percutaneous Transhepatic Gallbladder Drainage for Acute Cholecystitis.

Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association, 2017

Research

Efficacy and safety of endoscopic laser lithotripsy and lithotomy through the lumen-apposing metal stent for giant gallbladder stones.

VideoGIE : an official video journal of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 2020

Research

Outcomes of endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage: A multicenter study from India (with video).

Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology, 2024

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.