Treatment of Fanconi Syndrome
The treatment of Fanconi syndrome requires addressing the underlying cause while providing supportive care through fluid and electrolyte replacement, with specific therapies determined by the etiology. 1
Underlying Cause Management
- For cystinosis-related Fanconi syndrome, initiate cysteamine therapy as soon as diagnosis is confirmed, starting at 1 mg/kg/day and potentially increasing to 2 mg/kg if no improvement is observed 1
- In tyrosinemia type I-associated Fanconi syndrome, NTBC (nitisinone) treatment with dietary restriction of phenylalanine/tyrosine is associated with reversal or prevention of tubulopathy in nearly all cases within weeks 2
- For medication-induced cases (e.g., tenofovir, valproic acid), discontinuation of the offending agent is crucial and can lead to substantial recovery of proximal tubule function, though this may take months 3, 4, 5
- In supplement-induced cases (e.g., red yeast rice), discontinuation of the supplement and sometimes corticosteroid therapy may improve renal function 6
Supportive Care
- Provide fluid replacement with intravenous 10% dextrose/normal saline solutions at 1.5-2.0 times maintenance rate to maintain normoglycemia 1
- Replace lost electrolytes, particularly:
Nutritional Management
- For patients with cystinosis-related Fanconi syndrome:
Monitoring and Follow-up
- Regular assessment of renal function through:
- Blood: blood urea nitrogen, creatinine, electrolytes including bicarbonate, calcium, and phosphate 2
- Urine: glucose, amino acids, calcium, phosphate, calcium-to-creatinine ratio, tubular reabsorption of phosphate, total protein and albumin 2
- Renal ultrasound to monitor kidney structure 2
- Bone X-rays and densitometry to assess for rachitic changes from hypophosphatemia 2
Special Considerations
- For tyrosinemia type I patients who have undergone liver transplantation, periodic screening for renal disease is recommended as SA (succinylacetone) excretion continues post-transplant 2
- In patients with Fanconi anemia-related manifestations, additional monitoring is required:
Common Pitfalls and Caveats
- Standard renal function tests like estimated GFR and urine albumin/creatinine ratio are not sensitive markers of proximal tubule toxicity; more specific tests should be used for monitoring 4
- Diagnosis may be delayed due to vague symptoms, leading to unnecessary invasive investigations 3
- Recovery of proximal tubule function after withdrawal of toxic agents can take months, and chronic damage may persist in some cases 4
- For medication-induced cases, consider alternative therapies with less nephrotoxic potential (e.g., tenofovir alafenamide instead of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate for hepatitis B treatment) 3