Preferred Anticoagulants for Patients Undergoing Dialysis
For patients with acute or subacute heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) requiring dialysis, argatroban or danaparoid are the preferred anticoagulants over other non-heparin alternatives. 1
First-Line Anticoagulant Options for Dialysis Patients
- Argatroban is an ideal option for dialysis patients due to two key properties: it is not renally cleared, and its dialytic clearance by high-flux membranes is clinically insignificant 1
- Danaparoid has been successfully used during renal replacement therapy despite its dependence on renal clearance, with extensive clinical experience supporting its use 1
- The American Society of Hematology (ASH) guidelines specifically recommend argatroban, danaparoid, or bivalirudin for patients with acute HIT requiring dialysis 1
Evidence Supporting These Recommendations
- Prospective studies of argatroban in patients undergoing continuous renal replacement therapy showed low rates of new thrombosis (0%-4%) and major bleeding (0%-6%) 1
- A retrospective review of danaparoid use in dialysis patients with HIT showed thrombosis of either the patient or the hemodialysis circuit in only 7% of cases, with major bleeding in 6% 1
- Argatroban's pharmacokinetic profile in patients with renal failure is similar to that in patients with normal renal function, making it particularly suitable for this population 1
Alternative Options
- Bivalirudin is suggested as an alternative by ASH guidelines if argatroban or danaparoid are not available 1
- Regional citrate anticoagulation is recommended for patients with a past history of HIT who require ongoing renal replacement therapy 1
- Lepirudin has been used but carries increased bleeding risk due to its renal clearance and potential development of antihirudin antibodies that further reduce clearance 1
- Fondaparinux has limited evidence in dialysis patients, with data primarily from case reports 1
Factors Influencing Anticoagulant Selection
- Renal clearance: Argatroban is preferred for its lack of renal clearance, making it safer in patients with kidney failure 1
- Monitoring requirements: The ability to monitor the anticoagulant effect varies between agents and may influence selection 1
- Cost considerations: The ASH guidelines acknowledge that the cost of argatroban may be prohibitive at some clinical centers 1
- Clinical experience: Institutional familiarity with specific agents should be considered when selecting an anticoagulant 1
Special Considerations
- For patients with resolved HIT (normalized platelet count), saline flushes during dialysis may be a reasonable option 1
- Low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) have been associated with reduced lipid concentrations during dialysis compared to unfractionated heparin, which may be beneficial for some patients 2
- Regional anticoagulation techniques can limit anticoagulation to the extracorporeal circuit for patients at high bleeding risk 3
Monitoring and Management
- Regular monitoring of platelet counts is essential when using any anticoagulant in dialysis patients 1
- For patients with bleeding complications while on anticoagulation, immediate discontinuation of the anticoagulant and implementation of local hemostatic measures are recommended 4
- When restarting anticoagulation after major bleeding, consider using anti-Xa monitoring instead of PTT for heparin products 4
Contraindications and Cautions
- Avoid using heparin or LMWH in patients with a history of HIT due to risk of recurrence 1
- Be cautious with lepirudin in dialysis patients due to its prolonged half-life and potential for accumulation between dialysis sessions 1
- Consider the timing of dialysis sessions when selecting an anticoagulant, as some agents may have prolonged effects that persist after the procedure 1