What is the protocol for ruling out pulmonary embolism (PE)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 23, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Protocol for Ruling Out Pulmonary Embolism (PE)

The optimal protocol for ruling out pulmonary embolism involves risk stratification, followed by selective use of D-dimer testing and appropriate imaging based on pretest probability. 1

Initial Risk Stratification

  • Assess pretest probability using validated clinical decision tools or clinical judgment 1
  • Consider major risk factors: recent immobility, major surgery, lower limb trauma/surgery, pregnancy/postpartum, major medical illness, previous VTE 1
  • Use Wells score or simplified revised Geneva score to classify patients into risk categories 1, 2
  • Low probability = no risk factors; Intermediate = one risk factor; High = multiple risk factors 1

Low Pretest Probability Patients

  • Apply PERC (Pulmonary Embolism Rule-out Criteria) to patients with low pretest probability 2, 3
  • PERC criteria (all must be negative): age <50 years, heart rate <100 bpm, oxygen saturation ≥95% on room air, no unilateral leg swelling, no hemoptysis, no recent trauma/surgery, no prior VTE, no hormone use 2
  • If all PERC criteria are negative in a low-risk patient, PE can be safely ruled out without further testing (miss rate only 0.3%) 2, 3
  • If any PERC criterion is positive, proceed to D-dimer testing 1, 2

D-dimer Testing

  • Use D-dimer testing for patients with low or intermediate pretest probability who don't meet PERC criteria 1
  • D-dimer should NOT be performed if: alternative diagnosis is highly likely, clinical probability is high, or in probable massive PE 1
  • Use age-adjusted D-dimer thresholds (age × 10 ng/mL) for patients >50 years instead of generic 500 ng/mL cutoff 1
  • A negative D-dimer in low/intermediate risk patients effectively rules out PE without need for imaging 1

Imaging Studies

  • CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA) is the preferred imaging modality for patients with high pretest probability or positive D-dimer 1
  • Reserve ventilation-perfusion (V/Q) scans for patients with contraindications to CTPA (renal insufficiency, contrast allergy) or when CTPA is unavailable 1
  • Normal CTPA in low/intermediate risk patients effectively rules out PE 1
  • For high-risk patients with negative CTPA, consider additional testing (venous ultrasound, conventional pulmonary angiography) 1

Venous Ultrasound

  • Consider venous ultrasound as initial imaging in patients with obvious signs of DVT, contraindications to CTPA, or pregnancy 1
  • A positive finding of DVT on ultrasound in a patient with symptoms consistent with PE can establish VTE diagnosis without additional imaging 1
  • Consider lower extremity venous ultrasound as an additional test for patients with intermediate/high pretest probability and negative CTPA 1

Special Considerations

  • For suspected massive PE with hemodynamic instability, perform bedside echocardiography or emergency CTPA and initiate immediate IV heparin 1
  • In pregnant patients, consider venous ultrasound as initial imaging to avoid radiation exposure 1
  • For patients with borderline renal function or contrast allergy, V/Q scan or venous ultrasound may be preferred over CTPA 1

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Don't use D-dimer as a routine "screening" test for all patients with respiratory symptoms 1, 2
  • Don't perform D-dimer testing in patients with high clinical probability 1
  • Don't apply PERC criteria to patients with intermediate or high pretest probability 2
  • Don't rely solely on CTPA in high-risk patients without additional testing if CTPA is negative 1
  • Don't routinely perform CT venography as an adjunct to CTPA 1

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Pulmonary Embolism Rule-out Criteria

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Prospective multicenter evaluation of the pulmonary embolism rule-out criteria.

Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH, 2008

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.