How would I characterize and ICD (International Classification of Diseases) code a nondisplaced fracture of the distal fibula below the syndesmosis?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 26, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Characterization and ICD Coding for Nondisplaced Fracture of the Distal Fibula Below the Syndesmosis

A nondisplaced fracture of the distal fibula below the syndesmosis should be coded as S82.56XA (Nondisplaced fracture of lateral malleolus of unspecified fibula, initial encounter for closed fracture) in the ICD-10 coding system. 1, 2

Fracture Characterization

  • This fracture is classified as a distal fibular fracture occurring below the level of the syndesmosis (the fibrous joint between the distal tibia and fibula) 1
  • According to the Weber classification system, this would be categorized as a Weber Type A fracture (fracture below the level of the syndesmosis) 2
  • In the Lauge-Hansen classification, this likely represents a supination-external rotation injury, which is the most common mechanism for lateral malleolar fractures 1, 3
  • The fracture being nondisplaced indicates that the bone fragments maintain their normal anatomical alignment with minimal separation (<2mm) 2

Diagnostic Imaging Considerations

  • Standard radiographic protocols should include three views: anteroposterior, lateral, and mortise views to properly assess fracture stability 2
  • Weight-bearing radiographs are preferred as they can detect dynamic abnormalities such as joint mal-alignment, joint subluxation, and fracture displacement that may not be apparent on non-weight-bearing radiographs 2
  • CT imaging may be considered if there is concern for occult fractures or complex fracture patterns not clearly visualized on plain radiographs 1
  • MRI is not typically necessary for isolated nondisplaced distal fibula fractures but may be considered if there is concern for associated soft tissue injuries 1

Stability Assessment

  • Medial clear space of <4 mm confirms ankle stability, which is the most important criterion in determining management 2
  • Factors that would indicate instability include:
    • Medial tenderness, bruising, or swelling
    • Fibular fracture above the syndesmosis
    • Bi- or trimalleolar fractures
    • Open fracture
    • High-energy fracture injury 2

Treatment Implications

  • Immediate, full weight-bearing as tolerated is recommended for patients with a nondisplaced fracture of the distal fibula below the syndesmosis 2
  • Protection with a removable boot or brace is typically recommended while allowing weight-bearing as tolerated 2
  • Surgical management is indicated only if there is:
    • Displacement >2mm
    • Ankle mortise instability (medial clear space >4mm)
    • Bi- or tri-malleolar involvement
    • Open fracture
    • High-energy injury mechanism 2

ICD-10 Coding Details

  • S82.56XA represents the initial encounter for a nondisplaced fracture of the lateral malleolus (distal fibula) 2
  • The 6th character "6" indicates nondisplaced fracture
  • The 7th character "A" indicates initial encounter for closed fracture
  • For subsequent encounters, the 7th character would change:
    • "D" for routine healing
    • "G" for delayed healing
    • "K" for nonunion
    • "P" for malunion 2

Common Pitfalls and Caveats

  • Failure to evaluate for syndesmotic injury can lead to missed diagnoses and poor outcomes 4
  • Distal fibula nonunion, though uncommon with appropriate management, can occur and presents with persistent lateral ankle pain and tenderness at the fracture site 5
  • Early removal of immobilization before adequate healing can lead to displacement or nonunion 6
  • In patients with diabetes, neuropathy, or osteoporosis, more cautious management with longer immobilization periods may be necessary 2
  • Follow-up radiographs are essential to ensure proper healing and to detect any late displacement 2, 5

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Weight-bearing Status for Nondisplaced, Mildly Comminuted Distal Fibula Metaphysis Fracture

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Fibula fractures management.

World journal of orthopedics, 2021

Research

Fibular nonunion after closed rotational ankle fracture.

Foot & ankle international, 2004

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.