What does a score of zero on the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Stroke Scale for best language indicate?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 27, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

NIH Stroke Scale Score of Zero for Best Language (Item 9)

A score of zero on the NIH Stroke Scale for item 9 (Best Language) indicates normal language function with no aphasia. 1, 2

Understanding the NIHSS Language Assessment

  • The NIH Stroke Scale is a standardized stroke severity assessment tool with scores ranging from 0 to 42, where higher scores indicate more severe strokes 1
  • Item 9 specifically evaluates language function using the following scoring criteria:
    • 0 = Normal language (no aphasia)
    • 1 = Mild to moderate aphasia
    • 2 = Severe aphasia
    • 3 = Mute, global aphasia, or coma 1, 2

Clinical Assessment of Language Function

  • The clinical assessment for evaluating language function involves asking the patient to:
    • Describe a standardized picture
    • Name objects
    • Read sentences 2
  • A patient scoring 0 on this item demonstrates:
    • Normal conversational fluency
    • Good comprehension
    • Intact naming abilities
    • No significant word-finding difficulties 1, 2
  • The patient can produce grammatically correct sentences and follow all commands without difficulty 1

Distinguishing Language from Other Functions

  • It's critical to differentiate between language function (item 9) and articulation/dysarthria (item 10) when scoring the NIHSS 3
  • A patient may have normal language function (score 0 on item 9) but still have dysarthria (scoring 1 or 2 on item 10) 3
  • Similarly, language function should not be confused with level of consciousness (item 1A) - a patient must be sufficiently alert to assess language function accurately 4

Clinical Significance and Implications

  • Normal language function (score 0) is a positive prognostic indicator in stroke patients 2
  • The absence of aphasia on NIHSS should be interpreted with caution, as research shows NIHSS item 9 has a sensitivity of only 72% for detecting aphasia when compared to comprehensive language assessments 5
  • This means some patients with mild aphasia might be misclassified as having normal language function on the NIHSS 5

Common Pitfalls in Assessment

  • Do not mistake mild word-finding difficulties for normal language - even subtle hesitations or circumlocutions may indicate mild aphasia (score 1) 2
  • Ensure the patient is sufficiently alert for accurate language assessment - decreased consciousness can interfere with language evaluation 4
  • Consider cultural and educational factors that might affect language performance 2
  • Remember that recovery from aphasia often follows a trajectory, with significant improvements typically occurring in the first two weeks after stroke 6

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

NIH Stroke Scale Score for Patients with Severe Aphasia

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

NIH Stroke Scale Score for Dysarthria in Patients Unable to Communicate

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

NIH Stroke Scale Assessment of Level of Consciousness

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Accuracy of NIH Stroke Scale for diagnosing aphasia.

Acta neurologica Scandinavica, 2021

Research

Patterns of Recovery From Aphasia in the First 2 Weeks After Stroke.

Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR, 2019

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.