How do you screen a patient for asymptomatic Herpes Simplex Virus type 2 (HSV2)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 27, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Screening for Asymptomatic HSV-2 Infection

Type-specific serological testing using glycoprotein G-based assays is the recommended method for screening asymptomatic individuals for HSV-2 infection. 1, 2

Recommended Testing Approach

  • Type-specific serological assays such as enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) that detect antibodies to HSV glycoprotein G-2 (gG-2) should be used for screening asymptomatic individuals for HSV-2 infection 2, 1
  • These tests have high sensitivity and specificity (approximately 97% and 98%, respectively) for detecting HSV-2 antibodies 2
  • Venous blood samples should be collected for serological testing 2
  • Nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) are not appropriate for screening asymptomatic individuals without lesions 1

Target Populations for Screening

  • Type-specific HSV-2 serology should be used selectively for the following high-risk groups: 2, 1, 3
    • Pregnant women at risk of acquiring HSV infection close to delivery
    • Men who have sex with men
    • People who are HIV positive
    • Sexual partners of individuals with known genital herpes
  • Widespread screening for HSV-2 antibodies in the general population is discouraged 2, 1, 3
  • The US Preventive Services Task Force recommends against routine screening for HSV-2 infection among asymptomatic adolescents and adults 1

Interpretation of Results

  • A positive HSV-2 IgG antibody test indicates past exposure and ongoing latent infection with HSV-2 3
  • HSV-2 antibodies develop within several weeks after infection and persist indefinitely 3
  • The test cannot distinguish between recent and long-standing infections 3
  • False positives are more common in individuals with HSV-1 infection, especially with low index values 3

Confirmatory Testing

  • For low positive results (index value <3.0), confirmation with a second test using a different glycoprotein G antigen is recommended 3
  • Using the Biokit HSV-2 rapid assay as a confirmatory test improves the specificity of tests like HerpeSelect from 93.2% to 98.7% compared to Western blot 3
  • Western blot/immunoblot is considered the gold standard for HSV serologic testing but has limited availability 3

Clinical Pitfalls and Considerations

  • A negative result within 12 weeks of potential exposure may represent the "window period" and should be repeated after 12 weeks if recent acquisition is suspected 3
  • Serological tests alone cannot determine the etiology of a presenting genital lesion with certainty 2
  • IgM testing is not recommended for screening as approximately one-third of patients with recurrent genital herpes caused by HSV-2 have IgM responses, making it a poor indicator of recent infection 2
  • HSV type determination is important for counseling and prognosis, as HSV-2 has more frequent recurrences and subclinical shedding than HSV-1 in genital infections 1, 3

Post-Test Management

  • Patients with positive HSV-2 serology should be counseled about the natural history of the disease, potential for recurrent episodes, asymptomatic viral shedding, and sexual transmission risk 1
  • Patients should be advised to abstain from sexual activity while lesions are present, and condom use should be encouraged during all sexual exposures 1
  • Treatment options include episodic therapy for outbreaks or suppressive therapy to reduce recurrences and transmission risk 3

References

Guideline

Diagnostic Approach for Genital Herpes

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Significance of Positive HSV Type 2 IgG Antibody

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.