Is Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) therapy effective?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 28, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Effectiveness of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) Therapy

TMS therapy is effective for treatment-resistant depression with moderate effect sizes comparable to antidepressant medications, but its efficacy varies by condition and treatment protocol. 1

Evidence for TMS in Major Depressive Disorder (MDD)

  • TMS is recommended for patients with major depressive disorder who have shown partial or no response to two or more adequate pharmacologic treatment trials 1
  • Response rates range from 29-48% with a number needed to treat of 3.4 to 9 patients for response and 5 to 7 patients for remission 1
  • The aggregate literature suggests that the benefits of repetitive TMS (rTMS) for treatment-resistant depression in improving symptoms and facilitating remission outweigh the harms 1
  • TMS is well-tolerated with minimal side effects, generally limited to transient scalp discomfort or pain 2

Limitations and Considerations

  • One recent RCT in a veteran population with high rates of comorbid PTSD and substance use disorders found no significant differences between rTMS and sham treatment, suggesting placebo effects may play an important role 1
  • Access to TMS treatment can be challenging as it requires frequent onsite visits (typically 5 sessions per week for 4-6 weeks) 1
  • Predictors of better response include lower age, lower degrees of treatment resistance, and absence of comorbid anxiety or psychotic symptoms 3

TMS for Other Conditions

  • TMS has received FDA approval for obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) 4
  • For bipolar depression, a randomized controlled trial showed active deep TMS was superior to sham at endpoint with no treatment-emergent mania episodes 5
  • There is insufficient evidence to make a recommendation for or against theta-burst stimulation (TBS), a variation of TMS that uses rapid, repetitive pulses 1
  • Some evidence suggests TMS may have potential applications in substance use disorders by reducing craving and potentially improving cognitive control 1

Treatment Protocols and Optimization

  • Standard protocols typically involve high-frequency (10 Hz) stimulation over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex 2
  • Accelerated TMS protocols, with all treatments delivered over a few days rather than weeks, show promise with comparable efficacy to standard protocols 6
  • Optimal stimulation parameters are still being investigated, with research exploring sequential bilateral stimulation and extended number of pulses per session 3

Combination Approaches

  • TMS may be more effective when combined with behavioral interventions such as cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) 1
  • Some studies show promising results when TMS is combined with pharmacotherapy, such as nearly 50% of patients becoming abstinent from cigarettes when TMS is used with nicotine replacement therapy 1

Practical Considerations

  • TMS is generally considered safe with a low dropout rate for adverse events (4.5% in one large trial) 2
  • The most common side effects are mild and limited to transient scalp discomfort or pain 2
  • TMS is cost-effective compared to existing treatments for treatment-resistant depression, including pharmacological interventions and electroconvulsive therapy 3

While TMS shows promise as an effective treatment option, particularly for treatment-resistant depression, ongoing research is needed to determine optimal stimulation parameters and expand its applications to other conditions.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.